AOH :: GREENFF.TXT

Sustainable, ethical fast food



Date: July 21, 1995

From:Oras Tynkkynen, GreenLife Society Finland

HATE SIN, NOT THE SINNER - Gandhi in action in the 90's

The multinational corporate bastards are wreaking havoc around the 
world, and as enlightened earthdefenders we ought to fight against them, 
right? Think again. One successful campaign from Finland tells a different 
story of Gandhi in action.

McDonald's, one of the biggest companies in the world, celebrated its 
40th birthday on 15th of April. In just four decades it has grown from one 
family restaurant in Des Plaines, Illinois, to about 15,000 outlets in nearly 
80 countries. For McDonald's, the 15th of April was a day of recalling 
past successes.

The same day activists around the world told a different story - a story of 
40 years of environmental destruction, massacre of animals, exploiting 
workers and ruining people's health. Actions opposing McDonald's - some 
quite vehement - took place that day in several countries.

GreenLife Society Finland, the Finnish branch of GreenLife Society 
International, organized also fast food action in Finland. But there was 
something that made the Finnish action stand out from the mass of anti-
McDonald's actions around the world. To get a clear view what made it 
different, we have to get more than 125 years back in time.

FROM INDIA, WITH LOVE
Mohandas Gandhi was born in Gujarat, India in 1869. He studied in 
England and moved to South Africa at the age of 24. There he worked as 
a lawyer and got an insight into apartheid. He got involved in civil rights 
activities and soon became the leader of the South African Indian 
community. He was arrested several times. When he got back to India in 
1915, he was already a renowned popular leader. He led his country to 
freedom without violence and showed the way to independence to many 
other colonies.

Gandhi, nicknamed "Mahatma" or "the great soul", was the first person to 
implement non-violence - or satyagraha as he used to call it - in large 
scale. Millions of Indians fought the British rule, not with arms, but with 
love. When the rulers hit them, they turned their cheeks. It was something 
extraordinary - something which had no comparison in the history of 
mankind. To choose peace instead of violence, love instead of hate...

Most of you are probably very familiar with Gandhi and his thoughts, so 
there is no need to explain them further. The question is: how to 
implement non-violence in our work for a better world? Is there anything 
Gandhi's thoughts can teach us when we try save the environment in the 
90's?

FAST FOOD IS OK, DESTRUCTION IS NOT
Last autumn we got irritated by the huge quantities of waste ending to 
landfills from fast food restaurants. We were also frightened by the 
incredible plans of the three major Finnish hamburger chains to triple the 
number of their restaurants. That is why  we launched a major fast food 
campaign in Finland this spring. 

When we thought the thing over, we noticed that the problem with the 
fast food isn't really the fast food in itself, but the way the companies 
operate. It is not our problem if people eat their food fast. Actually there 
are many good points in favour of fast food - it is cheap, convenient and, 
of course, fast. The problem is that the companies don't care for the 
environment, workers, animal rights or customers' health. 

So what to do? Let's recall what Gandhi said: "Love your enemy." The 
usual thing would be to oppose the companies because they are the bad 
guys and we the good. But if we want to stop the destruction they are 
causing, why oppose them? Shouldn't we instead try to work together 
with them to change their behaviour?

Thus we decided not to work AGAINST McDonald's or anything else, 
but to work FOR sustainable and responsible fast food - a huge difference 
in attitude. Instead of opposing the companies and making their workers 
afraid of losing their jobs, we presented a vision of sustainable fast food - 
something we could all share. So instead of building a huge wall between 
"them" and "us", we were both on the same side. 

So we launched our campaign. We did a lot background work, produced 
a detailed fast food report, leaflets, press releases and post cards and 
organized a demonstration in front of the first McDonald's in Finland. We 
had meetings with the representatives of the companies in question. 

The benefits of our approach are great. We have better chances to affect 
the companies when we say that we, too, are trying to develop their 
business further. We don't want to harm their business, but make it 
sustainable. They can't dismiss us saying the usual thing ("they are just a 
bunch of anarchist opposing everything"). If they are not willing to 
change, people will start to question why. Why are THEY against 
environmental protection and animal rights? The campaign is also a lot 
easier to "sell" to the media and people because it is positive and 
constructive.

And indeed, the campaign was a success, well received among activists, 
journalists, business executives, restaurant workers and ordinary people 
alike.

DIFFERENT SHADES OF GREEN
Probably many of you reading this article will now question what I have 
said. How can you negotiate with McDonald's, the multi-billion company 
with its professional PR and law people? Can we always negotiate with 
people, or should we rather choose a side, work for good and against all 
evil?

Believe it or not, all company executives are humans, and some of them 
even quite humane. They tend to have values that are different from ours, 
but we all share a vision of a better planet for our children. Nobody wants 
environmental destruction, starvation or suffering. Many of the business 
people just don't see what are the consequences of their work.

I admit that there is a slight danger in this approach. When you discuss 
with people with a different kind of ideology you might end up checking 
your own. You might have to give up the opinion that you are always 
right. You might even start to understand the way "the others" are 
thinking. You don't have to sell your soul to the devil. You don't have 
give up your ethics. But yes, you will have to be ready to argue for it.

For years I have been negotiating with different company representatives 
and public officials. During these discussions I have learned a lot about 
life and people. We should not look for things that separate us, but rather 
the ones that unite us. The way I think is not always "the right", but there 
are many others that can be as well grounded.

Despite all this, I haven't had to abandon my basic ideology. No one can 
say that our demands to the fast food companies are not radical or 
revolutionary.

I think the approach we have been using means avoiding needless 
juxtapositions. Through dialogue it tries to make friends among the 
"enemies". But first and foremost it means understanding that there are no 
"good" and "bad" people, no black and white, just different shades of grey 
- or should I say green...

Oras Tynkkynen
GreenLife Society Finland
Rautatienkatu 14 A 27
33100 Tampere
FINLAND
Fax: +358-31-212 7257
E-mail: greenlife@freenet.hut.fi

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. McLibel Support Campaign                              Press Office  
PO Box 62                                        Phone/Fax 802-586-9628
Craftsbury VT 05826-0062                    Email dbriars@world.std.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe to the "mclibel" listserve, send email 

     To: majordomo@world.std.com
Subject: <not needed>
   Body: subscribe mclibel

To unsubscribe, change the body to "unsubscribe mclibel"

Lunarpages.com Web Hosting

The entire AOH site is optimized to look best in Firefox® 2.0 on a widescreen monitor (1440x900 or better).
Site design & layout copyright © 1986-2008 AOH
We do not send spam. If you have received spam bearing an artofhacking.com email address, please forward it with full headers to abuse@artofhacking.com.