AOH :: FUS130.TXT

Cold Fusion experiments and Bariloche - Argentina


Path: santra!tut!draken!kth!mcvax!uunet!lll-winken!ames!apple!motcsd!hpda!hpcupt1!vcate
From: vcate@hpcupt1.HP.COM (Vincent Cate)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Cold Fusion experiments at Bariloche - Argentina
Message-ID: <-286009998@hpcupt1.HP.COM>
Date: 28 Jun 89 21:37:13 GMT
Organization: Hewlett Packard, Cupertino
Lines: 449


Here is another paper.  It will be sf.ascii in the archive.
The Santhanam paper will be ks.ascii.  I will post the list
of papers in the archive after I send this off.

   -- Vince

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 28 Jun 89 13:36 MST
From: "Sergio Felicelli. University of Arizona. Tucson."
 <SERGIO@rvax.ccit.arizona.edu>
Subject: from Argentina through Arizona
To: vincent.cate@sam.cs.cmu.edu
X-Vms-To: IN%"vincent.cate@sam.cs.cmu.edu"

Dr. Vincent Cate

I'm sending a report of work done here at Bariloche, Argentina about CF.
We have suscribed to PHYSICS and last week we have sent this report to
Physics-Request, but until now has not been distributed.
As surely I have made some mistakes in sending the report, would you mind 
to tell me how can I do that, because people involved in CF experiments 
would like to receive opinions about their work.
Though this e-mail is being sent to you from Arizona, it is currently 
written in Argentina.
The reason: we have no yet a Bitnet node here.
Last question: how can I subscribe to Usenet alt.fusion newsgroup from 
Arizona?

Thanks for your help and feel free of redistribute the report enclosed if
you like.

      			Erwin G. Galdoz
      			e-mail: sergio@arizrvax.bitnet

____________________________________________________________________


       Cold Fusion experiments at Bariloche - Argentina
       ------------------------------------------------


 This report summarizes the results of experiments carried out
at Centro Atomico Bariloche (Argentina) from the beginning  of
April 1989.   They are based on neutron measurements performed
on both electrochemical cells and gas injection systems.
 During the last two decades, neutron transmission and diffrac-
tion experiments  have been conducted at our  Neutron  Physics
Division, most of them over the  thermal neutron energy range.
We therefore  decided to exploit  our previous  experience  in
measuring thermal neutrons using  3He  detectors,  in order to
devise a high efficiency detection system for that energy range.
 We started our work on electrochemical cells in collaboration
with scientists from the  Thermohydraulics Division, as it was
this kind of system on which the first  positive  results were
reported.
 Over a period of more than two weeks we performed experiments
according to the classical 'stationary' method  (as far as the
electrolytic  current is concerned),  with an essentially null
result.
 In order to more  effectively  discriminate the effect of the 
background in our measurements, we introduced another dimension 
- time - in the form of a pulsed current through the cell. The
basic concept behind this  methodology is  that  this kind  of
measurements should provide essentially 'self normalized' data,
bearing in mind the  difference in  time scales of the current
pulses and background fluctuations.    

 Our first positive  results were presented on May 2, 1989, as
Contribution # 22 to  'Special Session on Cold Fusion'  during
the  Spring Meeting of the APS (Baltimore):

           ==========================================

        DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF THERMAL NEUTRON MEASUREMENTS IN
         ELECTROCHEMICALLY PRODUCED COLD FUSION SUBJECT TO
                          PULSED CURRENT
    
    
         J.R. Granada, J. Converti, R.E. Mayer, G. Guido,      
       P.C. Florido, N.E. Patino, L. Sobehart, S. Gomez and    
                           A. Larreteguy                       
    
    
         Centro Atomico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro,      
             Comision Nacional de Energia Atomica and          
                   Universidad Nacional de Cuyo                
                 8400 S.C. de Bariloche, Rio Negro             
                             ARGENTINA                         
    
           
                            ----------   
    
                             ABSTRACT                          
    
        The present work  shows  the  results  of  measurements 
   performed on electrolytic  cells  using  a  high  efficiency 
   (22%)  neutron  detection  system  in  combination  with   a 
   procedure involving a  non-stationary  current  through  the 
   cell's circuit.
        Cold  fusion  was  produced   in   electrolytic   cells 
   containing LiH  dissolved in heavy water  with  a  Palladium 
   cathode. The  dynamic  response  to  low  frequency  current 
   pulses was measured. Characteristic patterns showing one  or 
   two bumps were  obtained  in  a  repeatable  fashion.  These 
   patterns are strongly  dependent  on the  previous  charging 
   history of the cathode.
        The technique employed seems to be very convenient as a 
   research  tool  for  a  systematic study of  the   different 
   variables governing the phenomenon.
    
                            ----------
    
    
        The exciting possibility of inducing the cold fusion of 
   deuterium nuclei has  been  supported  in  recent  years  by 
   studies on muonic D2 molecules, and very  recently  enhanced 
   by evidences on the  feasibility  of  using  electrochemical 
   methods.
        In  order  to   experimentally   explore   the   latter 
   mechanism, we have performed  measurements  on  electrolytic 
   cells using a high efficiency neutron  detection  system  in 
   combination with  a  procedure  involving  a  non-stationary 
   current through the cell's circuit.
        Electrolysis was produced in a cylindrical  pyrex  cell 
   of 39 mm internal diameter and  120  mm  height.  The  anode 
   consisted of Platinum foils of 20 x 45 mm2  located at  both 
   sides of a 27 x 42 x 1 mm3 Palladium cathode. The latter was 
   cut from a 99.9% pure  material,  cleaned  and  degassed  in 
   vacuum at 160 C during 90 minutes. It  was  supported  by  a 
   stainless steel  holder  and  completely  submerged  in  the 
   electrolyte. A cathode consisting of 99.99%  pure  Palladium 
   wire 0.5 mm in diameter and 120 mm long was also  used.  The 
   electrolyte consisted of 0.1  M  Lithium  hydride  in  99.66 
   weight percent D2O and 0.34 percent H2O.
        Based on our previous  experience  in  thermal  neutron 
   work, we decided to look for those neutrons coming  up  from 
   the cell position which may arrive at  the  detectors  after 
   slowing  down  their  energy  in  a  moderating  medium.  To 
   establish the design  parameters  and  optimization  of  the 
   complete detection arrangement, neutronic calculations  were 
   performed on the  basis  of  a  one-dimensional  cylindrical 
   geometry, using the code AMPX-IIA fed  with  standard  cross 
   section  libraries.  Having  defined  all  the  regions  and 
   materials involved, the design  criterium  adopted  was  the 
   attainment  of  a  maximum  counting  rate  in  the  neutron 
   detectors, leaving as optimization parameters  the  size  of 
   the moderator  and  reflector  regions,  together  with  the 
   number of detectors  (3He,  10  atm.  filling  pressure,  1" 
   diameter,  6"  active  length).  The  configuration  adopted 
   consists of an arrangement of 18 tubes,  with  a  calculated 
   efficiency of 20% which includes the solid angles  subtended 
   by them. This calculation was  experimentally  validated  by 
   placing  natural uranium pellets  (conveniently  packed)  of 
   known activity at the site of the electrolytic cell yielding 
   an efficiency of 22% for the whole detection system.
        The detectors were bunched into three clusters  of  six 
   tubes each, and the signals in the three  acquisition  lines 
   strongly  discriminated  in  pulse   height   before   being 
   channeled   to   an   anti-coincidence   logic   to   reject 
   simultaneous  pulses  (within 2 microseconds)  coming   from  
   different detector clusters.
        The cell was kept for long periods (few days)  under  a 
   low current, typically 150 mA for the Pd sheet and 50 mA for 
   the  wire,  while  the  corresponding  voltages  were  below 
   4 V. After this  'charging'  period,  the  experiments  were 
   carried out in a pulsed fashion: each cycle consisted  of  a 
   90 sec. period at 6 V and 64 sec. at  open  circuit,  and  a 
   typical run contained 20-30 of such cycles. The counts  were 
   accumulated  into  512  channels  (0.3  sec.  width)  of   a 
   multichannel  scaler,  triggered  simultaneously  with   the 
   beginning of each cycle. After this run, the  procedure  was 
   repeated with a dummy cell to measure the  background;  this 
   cell was identical to the one described  previously,  except 
   that the electrolyte was prepared with H2O.
        Through our measurements we have observed several  well 
   defined features. Figure 1 shows a typical time spectrum  of 
   observed neutron counts for a sheet cathode  that  had  been 
   activated for 20 hours. Two bumps are clearly visible, about 
   30% over the background level indicated by the dashed  line. 
   This structure repeats  itself  for  cathodes  with  similar 
   charging history, either sheet or wire. These features  seem 
   to indicate an increase in the fusion rate  associated  with 
   the enhanced mobility of deuterons  in  and  out  of the  Pd 
   induced by the current pulse.
        Figure  2  shows  the  results  of  increased   neutron 
   production during the zero current period of the cycle,  for 
   a cathode charged at 250 mA during 75 minutes. In this case, 
   the absence of a bump during the first  part  of  the  cycle 
   seems to  correlate  with  the  reduced  capability  of  the 
   deuterons  to  penetrate  into  the  saturated   (at   least 
   superficially) cathode.
        The above results suggest that an increased fusion rate 
   can be achieved under strong non-equilibrium conditions.
        Prolongued cycling tends to discharge the cathode. This 
   is indicated by the results of Fig. 3, in which the  squares 
   correspond to the spectrum accumulated during the first five 
   cycles of a run with a 75 sec. half period for a cathode  in 
   the same initial conditions  as  in  Fig.  1.  The X symbols
   correspond to the last five cycles of  a  total  of  twenty. 
   This  latter  spectrum  shows an  almost  complete  lack  of 
   structure and a reduction in  the total  number  of  counts, 
   suggesting that the neutron producing  process  switched-off 
   leaving a counting level which  can  be  considered  as  the 
   proper background for this measurement.
        Based on the efficiency  of  our  detection  system  we 
   infer from our results  a rate of ca. 0.3 fusions per second, 
   consistent with reported negative results by  other  workers 
   using less efficient  detection  devices  when  cold  worked 
   cathodes are used.
        The features described in Figs. 1, 2 and  3  have  been 
   consistently  verified  in  more   than   twenty   different 
   experiments performed over a period of  a  week.  Equivalent 
   measurements alternatively done using H2O based  electrolyte 
   show spectra like the one presented in Fig. 4, in  which  no 
   definite structure can be observed. A best fit study of  the 
   light water spectra obtained for a number of runs made under 
   the same conditions gives a  horizontal  line  as  the  most 
   probable curve (98 % confidence level).
        In conclusion, we have established a strong correlation 
   between the neutron counting rate and  the  cycling  of  the 
   current during the electrolysis of D2O. This  suggests  that 
   this technique is very  adequate  to  discriminate  the  low 
   counting  rate  associated  with  the  induced  cold  fusion 
   process.
    
        We wish  to thank  D. Delmastro, M.  Salvatore  and  V. 
   Ishida  for  their  collaboration  in   carrying   out   the 
   measurements through long days and longer nights; and to  V. 
   H. Gillette, J. Dawidowski, G. Lantschner, M. Abbate and  M. 
   M. Sbaffoni for their help and encouragement;  and  also  to 
   the technicians L. Capararo, R.  Bravo,  D.  Mateos  and  M. 
   Enevoldsen through whose efforts  all  this  work  could  be 
   started in a very short time.

             
                          FIGURE CAPTIONS                      
    
   Fig. 1.  Typical time spectrum of  observed  neutron  counts 
            for a sheet cathode activated  for  20  hours.  The 
            dashed horizontal  line  indicates  the  background 
            level  (see  Fig.  4).   The   current   pulse   is 
            indicated at the bottom.
   Fig. 2.  Increased neutron counting  rate  during  the  zero 
            current period of the cycle for a  cathode  charged 
            at 250 mA during 75 minutes (see text).
   Fig. 3.  The squares correspond to the spectrum  accumulated 
            during the first five cycles of a  run  with  a  75 
            second period, whereas the X simbols correspond  to 
            the last five cycles of a total of twenty (see text 
            for details).
   Fig. 4.  Background spectrum  as  obtained  using  H2O-based 
            electrolyte.
    
 

                                     COUNTS/SEC
                   
        0.00       0.05      0.10      0.15      0.20      0.25      0.30
        0 +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
          |    |              |
          |    |
          |    |       ---O---
          |    |              |
      100 +    |              ---O---
          |    |
   C      |    |              |  ---O---
   H      |    |
   A      |    |                    ---O---
   N  200 +    |              |
   N      |    |               ---O---
   E      |    |
   L      |    |           ---O---
          |    |
   N  300 +----+              ---O---
   U      |                   |
   M      |                     ---O---
   B      |
   E      |                   |     ---O---
   R  400 +
          |                ---O---
          |                   |
          |                   ---O---
          |
      500 +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+


                               FIGURE 1




                                     COUNTS/SEC
                   
        0.00       0.05      0.10      0.15      0.20      0.25      0.30
        0 +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
          |    |          ---O---
          |    |
          |    |       ---O---
          |    |
      100 +    |
          |    |        ---O---
   C      |    |
   H      |    |       ---O---
   A      |    |
   N  200 +    |
   N      |    |               ---O---
   E      |    |
   L      |    |
          |    |               ---O---
   N  300 +----+
   U      |     
   M      |                        ---O---                    
   B      |
   E      |                           ---O---
   R  400 +
          |     
          |                        ---O---
          |     
          |            ---O---           
      500 +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+


                               FIGURE 2




                                     COUNTS/SEC
                   
        0.00       0.05      0.10      0.15      0.20      0.25      0.30
        0 +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
          |    | ------O---X--
          |    |                                  O first five cycles
          |    |      --------OX-------           X last  five cycles
          |    |
      100 +    |    -------O--X----
          |    |
   C      |    |        X     ----------O----------
   H      |    |
   A      |    |        X            ----------O----------
   N  200 +    |
   N      |    |        X --------O--------
   E      |    |
   L      |----+  ------O--X--       
          |     
   N  300 +            -------O-----X-
   U      |     
   M      |                X     -----------O------------
   B      |
   E      |                   X          ------------O------------
   R  400 +
          |                   ---X------O----------
          |         
          |             ---------O------X--
          |
      500 +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+


                               FIGURE 3






                                     COUNTS/SEC
                   
        0.00       0.05      0.10      0.15      0.20      0.25      0.30
        0 +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
          |    |        --O--
          |    |
          |    |               --O--
          |    |
      100 +    |          --O--
          |    |
   C      |    |              --O--
   H      |    |
   A      |    |                --O--
   N  200 +    |
   N      |    |              --O--
   E      |    |
   L      |    |             --O--
          |    |
   N  300 +----+              --O--
   U      |     
   M      |                  --O--
   B      |
   E      |                 --O--
   R  400 +
          |                     --O--
          |     
          |                      --O--
          |
      500 +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+


                               FIGURE 4

 
 
               ===========================================


 A few points must be stressed concerning the above paper. First of
all, at the time  of its presentation our  neutron detection system 
was the most efficient and it still seems to be in that class after
the Santa Fe Conference. 
 The experimental  device was mounted  in a temperature controlled,
low humidity room  and protected against mechanical vibrations. The
preamplifiers were  polarized by batteries, while the HV source was
coupled to the power line through induction transformers.
 The  '2 of 3'  logic proved to be  extremely successful to prevent 
the admittance of noise, as checked through the generation of acous-
tic vibrations,  induction from  the  pulsed current wires  and  rf
signals. Of course, any of the  above  mentioned  effects  severely 
affected each of our three  independent lines  before going through
that logic.
 The pulse height spectra from our detection clusters were constant-
ly monitored  and the only pulses accepted  were those falling into
the peak(50%) of the characteristic 3He spectrum,in order to reduce
the effect of electronic (base line) noise.
 As for the background measurements, they included  runs  with  H2O
cells pulsed under the same  conditions of the sample  (D2O) cells;
also we performed  measurements with  sample cells  with no pulsing
and without any cell inside the detection system.
 Finally, during the last four weeks, we have  repeated  many times
the kind of features showed at Baltimore, using  different kinds of
cathodes, current densities and periods.  We are now in position to
fully confirm our early results,  after  achieving  repetitivity in
the neutron response for cathodes with a similar  charging history,
and performing all the checks we managed to imagine.

 A final point concerning the fusion rate. It is  clear for us that
in our  experiments only the  first atomic layers are  affected, on
the basis of the  time scale involved.  Consequently, we  can  only
give a figure which represents a total, time averaged  fusion rate,
and not normalized to the number of deuterons in the whole cathode.
 A full paper containing our latest results is in preparation.


June 20, 1989
                                         J. Rolando Granada

Centro Atomico Bariloche, 8400 S.C. de Bariloche (RN), ARGENTINA
FAX: +54 944 26262,
T: +54 944 26264
BITNET:  sergio@arizrvax


Make REAL money with your website!

The entire AOH site is optimized to look best in Firefox® 2.0 on a widescreen monitor (1440x900 or better).
Site design & layout copyright © 1986-2008 AOH
We do not send spam. If you have received spam bearing an artofhacking.com email address, please forward it with full headers to abuse@artofhacking.com.