AOH :: EMP1.TXT

Electromagnetic Pulse Warfare - how detonating just a very few nukes can cripple a country





                (word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
                      Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
                           Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
                                    PO BOX 1031
                                Mesquite, TX 75150

                       There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
                  on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
                                files on KeelyNet!

                                  August 25, 1991

                                     EMP1.ASC
       --------------------------------------------------------------------
            This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Nancy Stoughton.
       --------------------------------------------------------------------

                              ELECTRO MAGNETIC PULSES
                              ------- -------- ------

       Imagine a very  bright  flash  in the sky! No one is hurt. But, your
       transistor radio stops playing, your  car won't start, the telephone
       doesn't ring, lights stay off, and we find ourselves  in  the  stone
       age!

       THE developement of  modern  high-tech  semiconductor  devices  have
       paralleled unsettled relations between the nations of the world with
       resulting technological advances   affecting   the  lives  of  every
       citizen of North  America.   Communications have been  made  faster,
       automobiles more fuel-efficient   and   maintenance-free,  TV  sets,
       video-tape recorders, and virtually every other piece of electronics
       equipment have been improved by the  advent of the semiconductor and
       its high-tech advancements.    The  relationship   between   nuclear
       weapons and the recent electronics advances may seem unclear, but
       a nuclear attack  on  the  North  American continent could make that
       relationship glaringly apparent.

       ALL nuclear explosions produce electromagnetic  pulses  (EMP's)  and
       the ensuing induced voltages and currents produced in conductors
       ( wires and cables ) are comparable in strength to  the strongest of
       lightning bolts.  EMP's may reach 3 million volts and 10,000 amperes
       for a total of 30-billion watts of energy.

       The largest commercial radio stations in the U.S. and Canada radiate
       50,000 watts, or  approximately  one-millionth that much power!  The
       major difference between  EMP's and  lightning  is  that  EMP's  are
       induced simultaneously over  an  entire wide area,  while  lightning
       occurs at a single location.

                            Significance of the Problem
                            ------------ -- --- -------

       THREE ten-megaton thermonuclear  weapons  detonated  250 miles ( 400
       kilometers ) above the United States  or  Canada would produce EMP's
       strong enough to knock out the entire electrical power grid of North
       America including the  entire civilian-telephone network,  and  just
       about every broadcast station.


                                      Page 1





       Virtually every piece  of  unprotected  electronic  equipment in the
       country -- radios, TV sets, computers, electronic controls in homes,
       office buildings, factories, cars,  airplanes,  and  instruments  in
       hospitals -- would be damaged, if not destroyed.  The  pulses  would
       also damage or  destroy  large  portions  of  the military command's
       control and communication (C3) system.

       A chain reaction could be set in motion at nuclear power plants, due
       to electromagnetic pulses. Although it is a point that is frequently
       disputed, the possibility exists that  reactor  core meltdowns might
       occur as a result of EMP's.

       The meltdowns would  be  a by-product of electronic  control  system
       failure.  The control  systems  are  used to monitor and control the
       processes at the plants.

       The EMP's could cause the system  to  fail  and result in partial or
       complete loss of  control  over vital functions, causing  subsequent
       melt-downs.

       We know that those nuclear plants are designed to be fail safe,
       but has anyone  considered  the possibility of every circuit breaker
       in a plant failing at the same instant?

                             Characteristics of EMP's
                             --------------- -- -----

       AT an altitude of 250 miles, the  gamma  rays  produced in the first
       few nano-seconds (  billionths-of-a-second ) of a nuclear  explosion
       can travel hundreds of kilometers before colliding with electrons in
       atmospheric molecules.

       That kind of  collision  may  take  place in a region 2,000 miles in
       diameter and 6-miles  thick.  Electrons  are  accelerated  by  those
       collisions, a phenomenon referred to as the Compton effect; and upon
       reaching the earth's  magnetic  field,  they set up  electromagnetic
       pulses that radiate downward toward earth (Fig.1).

       Due to the extremely large area of collision, vast amounts of ground
       area are exposed  to  electromagnetic  fields  with  strengths up to
       50,000-volts per meter.  The ground  area exposed to electromagnetic
       pulses could cover the entire continental United States  and most of
       Canada by one nuclear blast; if not, certainly large regions such as
       New England would be electrically and electronically devastated.
















                                      Page 2





       FIG. 1 --  Electrons  set  into  motion by gamma rays from a nuclear
                 explosion in  space will  produce  enormous  electromotive
                 pulses (EMP's) when the negative charges enter the Earth's
                 magnetic-field. It is estimated that the  ideal height for
                 such an  explosion  should  be 250 miles above the Earth's
                 surface.

                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
                      :                                     :
                      :               O - Nuclear Explosion :
                      :                                     :
                      :             /  /                    :
                      :            /  /   - Gamma Rays      :
                      :   ---------------------------       :
                      :  <  Earth's Magnetic Field   >      :
                      :   ---------------------------       :
                      :   *******   *******   *******       :
                      :    *****     *****     *****        :
                      :     ***  EMP  ***  EMP  ***         :
                      :    *****     *****     *****        :
                      :   *******   *******   *******       :
                      : ===============================     :
                      :            EARTH                    :
                      :                                     :
                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

                                   Vulnerability
                                   -------------

       THE effects that electromagnetic  pulses  would  have  on  a mass of
       circuitry are difficult  to  predict  because  the interactions  are
       complex.  But, the  more complex the components, the easier they are
       to damage.  Power lines are one avenue for EMP damage, and a company
       making a shielded  tubing  to go  over  power  and  signal  carrying
       conductors obviously had  EMP  in  mind  when  they  invented  their
       "Zippertubing". That covering acts as a partial shield to EMP's.

       FOR each component,  damage  would  come from the internal pickup of
       the circuit itself,  as well as  surges  fed  to  it  by  all  other
       attached conductors (power lines, other circuits,and metal parts).

       ANOTHER concern is  that generators and motors with  their  numerous
       internal windings of copper wire could be rendered useless in an EMP
       attack; and with  subsequent  inoperative  water  pumping  stations,
       desert population-centers could  persih.   In  the  dead  of winter,
       motors in heating units would be destroyed and the  chilling  freeze
       in the northern portions of the North American continent would bring
       those areas to  a  standstill.   Food  and fuel shipments would halt
       because fusible links and electronic ignitions would be destroyed in
       cars and trucks.  It's difficult  to  conceive  a family anywhere on
       the continent not suffering extreme hardships.

       THE more complex  the  electronics components, the  more  vulnerable
       they are to   electromagnetic   pulses.   Hardness   describes   the
       vulnerability of an electrical device  and  it is best for old-style
       vacuum tubes, less   for   semi-conductors,  and   even   less   for
       microcircuitry.

       It would take  100  times  more  EMP energy to damage the tubes than
       integrated circuits.  Computers may  be upset through memory erasure
       with 100 times  less  energy  than  required  to  damage  integrated




       circuits; refer to Fig. 3.  Aircraft in the air
       and parked on  open  surfaces would be disabled, because electronics
       controls
       the crafts' flight instruments and control surfaces.

                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
                      :(-8)(-6)(-4)(-2) (1) (2) (4) (6) (8) :
                      :::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::
                      :                          ######     :
                      :                                     :
                      :         $$$$$$$$                    :
                      :                                     :
                      :      %%%%%%%                        :
                      :                                     :
                      :    &&&&&&&                          :
                      :                                     :
                      :::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::
                      :(-8)(-6)(-4)(-2) (1) (2) (4) (6) (8) :
                      :( Powers of TEN)        <Fig. 3>     :
                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
                      :  RANGE OF THRESHOLD ENERGY, JOULES  :
                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
                      : # = Motors and Transformers         :
                      : $ = Vacuum Tubes                    :
                      : % = Low-Power Transistors           :
                      : & = Integrated Circuits             :
                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

         Hardening Communications Equipment
         --------- -------------- ---------

       HARDENING of electronics communications  equipment  is  vital to the
       military, and, to  a  lesser  extent,  the civilian  populace.   The
       Department of Defense    has    established    an    Electromagnetic
       Compatibility Program (EMCP)    to    ensure   that   all   military
       Communication-Electronic (CE) equipment subsystems,  and systems are
       protected from electromagnetic interference of all kinds.

       That program was   implemented   to   ensure   that  electromagnetic
       compatibility is maintained   through    design,   acquistion,   and
       operational phases.  Numerous   semiconductor   manufacturers    now
       produce what are  called  "radiation-hardened"  integrated circuits,
       just for that reason.

       THERE are three major design criteria  which must be considered when
       hardening against EMP's.  They are cost, the equipment's  ability to
       survive EMP, and  failure  rates  of the shielding components.  COST
       includes both installation   and   maintenance.    Some   protection
       practices, such as shielding the entire communication  site,  may be
       attractive from a  technical  point  of  view, but are impractically
       expensive.

       THE electronic equipment's ability  to survive an EMP attack must be
       measured in order to determine how much EMP protection is needed.  A
       testing device    for   measuring   the   radiated   electromagnetic
       susceptibility of an    electronic    device    is    a   Transverse
       Electromagnetic Mode (TEM) cell.

       A TEM cell  consists  of a group of  electronic  instruments  and  a
       special specimen holder that simulates an environment of free space.

                                      Page 4





       The TEM cell     is     used    for    performing    electromagnetic
       interference/electromagnetic compatibility   (EMI/EMC)  measurements
       and evaluating protection devices.

       Shielding Methods
       --------- -------

       IN order to  predict  the  effect  of  an electromagnetic  pulse  on
       electronic equipment, it is necessary to assess the enviroment.  The
       structures housing the  electronic  equipment  are  made  in various
       shapes and sizes,  and  are  connected   to  the  outside  world  by
       conductors such as utility lines and pipes, communication lines, and
       access and ventilation structures.(Refer to fig.5)



                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
                      :   EMP                  Lightning    :
                      :  ////                   V V V       :
                      :   ------------------------------    :
                      :   !*            Building       !    :
                      :P--+**                          !    :
                      :   !*                           !    :
                      :   !   EMP Penetration          !    :
                      :   !                            !    :
                      :   !                            !    :
                      : +-+    *                       !    :
                      : ! !   ***                      !    :
                      : ! -----!------------------------    :
                      : !      !                            :
                      :=!======!==========================  :
                      :Gnd     ! - Buried Cable             :
                      :--------+                            :
                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
                      :  P = Power Lines        Fig. 5. --  :
                      : -- A sealed metal box is an ideal   :
                      : structure for eliminating EMP pen-  :
                      : etration. However, power lines and  :
                      : signal cables require entry ports   :
                      : thus compromising the integrity of  :
                      : a shielded building. Obviously, it  :
                      : is apparent that doors and windows  :
                      : would have a greater leakage effect.:
                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
















                                      Page 5





       That combination of  criteria  makes  the exact determination of the
       interaction of an EMP with such a  variety  of  structures extremely
       difficult.  However, for complex systems, it is convenient  to  have
       several layers of shielding.  (Refer to Fig. 6).


                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
                      :               Shield 1              :
                      :         ********************        :
                      :        *  Zone 1 (internal) *       :
                      :       *    ==============    *      :
                      :      *    =    Zone 2    =----*     :
                      :      * g =   ##########   = g *     :
                      :      * r =  ############  = r *     :
                      :      * o =--###ZONE 3###  = o *     :
                      :      * u =  ############--= u *     :
                      :      * n =   ##########   = n *     :
                      :      * d =   (cabinet-    = d *     :
                      :       *---= environment) =   *      :
                      :        *   ==============   *       :
                      :         *   Shield 2       *        :
                      :          ******************         :
                      :    !------!                         :
                      :    !                                :
                      :    !        Zone 0 (External-       :
                      :    !                Environment)    :
                      :----!--------------------------------:
                      :    =     EARTH                      :
                      :                                     :
                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
                      : Fig. 6 -- More than one shield can  :
                      : be used to secure the environment of:
                      : the machinery and electronic mat-   :
                      : erial contained within a building.  :
                      : The building can provide the initial:
                      : shield. Shielded rooms or metal cab-:
                      : inets may provide a second shield.  :
                      : A third shield (not diagrammed)     :
                      : would protect entry cables from     :
                      : violating the shielded area of      :
                      : zone 3.                             :
                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

       Shield 1
       ------ -

       A structure composed  of  a  great  deal  of  metal is well shielded
       against electro-magnetic pulses, while  a building made primarily of
       wood is virtually  unshielded  against  EMP's.   Continuous,  closed
       sheet-metal shields are,  by far, the most effective electromagnetic
       shields.

       It is imperative  that  the  internal   environment  of  zone  1  be
       connected to the  outside world.  That fact makes  a  closed  sheet-
       metal shield impossible.   Apertures  in  shield  1 create a special
       problem in protecting communication sites from EMP penetration.




                                      Page 6





       THE electromagnetic field penetration depends on the aperature size.
       If a given  area  of  wall  opening  is  subdivided  into  ten small
       openings having the same total area,  the  penetrating EMP fields at
       an interior point will be 1/SQR(10) as large as for  a  single large
       opening of the same total area.  (Refer to Fig. 7).

                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
                      :        !!           !!              :
                      : ###### !!  ######## !!              :
                      :      # !!         # !!              :
                      : EMP *==!!         # !!              :
                      :      # !!         # !!              :
                      :      # !!    E   *==!!              :
                      : EMP *==!!    M  **==!!              :
                      :      # !!    P  **==!!              :
                      :      # !!        *==!!              :
                      : EMP *==!!         # !!              :
                      :      # !!         # !!              :
                      :      # !!         # !!              :
                      : EMP *==!!         # !!              :
                      :      # !!         # !!              :
                      :      #            #                 :
                      : ######     ########                 :
                      :    Shield       Shield              :
                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
                      : Fig. 7 -- The electromagnetic field :
                      : penetration into a ported shield is :
                      : minimized by reducing the size of   :
                      : the openings. In the diagram the    :
                      : open area of the port of the example:
                      : on the right is equal to the sum of :
                      : the areas in the example at left.   :
                      : The diagram clearly shows that the  :
                      : penetration of an EMP is less when  :
                      : equal areas are summed from several :
                      : small ports.                        :
                      :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

       Therefore, it is  better for a structure to have more small openings
       than just a  few  larger openings.   A  common  treatment  for  such
       openings is to cover them with a conducting screen  or  mesh so that
       the large opening  is converted to a multitude of small openings, or
       use a glass  impregnated with metal.   That  glass,  despite  having
       metal in it,  offers  approximately  the  same  degree   of   visual
       attenuation or lack of clarity as looking through a screen door from
       within the house.

       Shields 2 and 3
       ------- - --- -

       THE second-level shield  seperates the internal environment from the
       sensitive small-signal circuits   within  the  electronic  equipment
       found within Zone   2.   Shielding  here  may  be  accomplished   by
       electrically grounding the metal cabinets and equipment.

       SHIELD 3 involves  the  shielding  of  the  interconnection  of  the
       equipment.  That could involve elaborate  design  of interconnecting
       signal transmission lines.  Fiberoptic signal transmission shows


                                      Page 7





       great promise here  because  it  is  not  effected  by  any  type of
       electromagnetic interference.

       Hardening Aircraft and Missles
       --------- -------- --- -------

       GENERALLY, the EMP  interaction   with   electrical  systems  inside
       structures such as aircraft and missles depends upon  a multitude of
       factors.  Aircraft and   missles  usually  have  a  nearly  complete
       metallic exterior covering   that    serves   as   a   shield   from
       electromagnetic fields.  However, that shield alone  is  not  enough
       protection against electromagnetic pulses.

       Missles and Aircraft  are  equipped  with  computers  that cannot be
       upset even for an instant.  They must be partically well hardened.
       AT the present time, there is no  agreement  on  the  most effective
       ways to harden aircraft and missles.  Heavy shielding, like the type
       used at communication sites, is obviously impractical because of the
       added weight that the aircraft has to carry.

       Instead, EMP resistance  is designed into the aircraft's  equipment.
       One example of  that  would be in the area of circuit design.  Small
       loops make better  antennas for EMP's  than  short  straight  lines;
       therefore, circuits are designed in tree or branching layouts rather
       than in more conventional circuit loops.

       Is Shielding Help on the Way?
       -- --------- ---- -- --- ----

       IN the last  decade,  electronic  devices have proliferated  in  all
       areas of our  lives.   That influx of products has caused a problem:
       Noise Pollution, or   EMI/RFI   (  electromagnetic/radio   frequency
       interference).  Over 80,000 cases of noise pollution  were  reported
       to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) in 1982.

       STRANGE as it  may  sound,  the  plastics  industry is coming to the
       rescue with plastic  electronic-equipment   enclosures  specifically
       designed for both  EMI containment and shielding.   Obviously,  with
       EMP's as an  external  disturbance,  the  containment  of a field is
       academic, but the shielding from an outside field is crucial.

       The parameter describing that is  Shielding  Effectiveness  (SE) and
       the equation for shielding effectiveness is

                                    SE = A + R,

       or shielding effectiveness equals Absorbed plus Reflected energy.
       HIGHLY conductive materials  such  as  pure  metal  shields  reflect
       approximately 99 percent  of  the  energy and adsorb 1 percent.  But
       plastics with metallic  composite   fillers,   metallic  paints  and
       sprays, or even impregnated wire meshes still reflect  80 percent of
       the energy and absorb 20 percent.

       If EMP's and  the disturbing effects of electromagnetic fields still
       seem like an  abstraction  or  a physicist's  dream,  consider  that
       event.

       A manufacturer of buses designed for city use had just  delivered  a
       fleet when, during a test drive, a problem was discovered.  After

                                      Page 8





       going over the  top  of  a  hill, the driver tried to brake, only to
       discover he had no brakes until he  got  to  the bottom of the hill.
       Upon logical investigation  of  that problem, field-strength  meters
       demonstrated that a  local  television  station  had  a  lobe-shaped
       radiation pattern that intersected the hill's apex.

       The microprocessor-controlled anti-skid  braking  system  on the bus
       had sensitive circuitry that became inoperative because  of  the  TV
       signal.  The bus,  though,  was  made safe by properly shielding the
       enclosure housing the  electronics.   Graphite,  a  moderately  good
       conductor, is fabricated   within   large   plastic    sheets    for
       applications such as that.

       IF a signal  as small as that can effect circuitry that drastically,
       you can imagine what an EMP could  do  and  likewise you can see how
       crucial EMI shielding  is.   But will EMI shielding  be  universally
       implemented into new equipment?

       The Military's Involvement
       --- ---------- -----------

       THE military is  very concerned with EMP's. The Army has established
       its Aurora Tree test facility in Aldelphi,  Maryland.   The Navy has
       the Casino and Gamble-2 x-ray emitting facilities, but the Air Force
       probably has the  most  interesting  project  of  all.   It  is  the
       Trestle, after the railroad structure it resembles.

       THAT 12-story (118  feet)  high,  58-meter (200-foot) square deck is
       flanked by a 50-foot wide adjoining  ramp  upon which aircraft to be
       tested are rolled  up.   The  Trestle can support aircraft  weighing
       550,000 pounds and is built with one-foot by one-foot wooden columns
       using no nails  or  metal  of any kind.  That largest glue-laminated
       structure in the world uses 250,000  wooden  bolts  to hold its six-
       million board feet  of lumber together --- enough  for  4,000  frame
       houses.  The structure  at  Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico cost
       approximately 58-million dollars.

       THE Trestle has two 5-million volt  pulsers  that  discharge  energy
       into wire transmission  lines surrounding the aircraft  under  test.
       Sensors capture aircraft  response  signals and fiber-optic channels
       transmit that sensor data to computers for processing.

       The processing equipment, though,  naturally  resides  inside a very
       well shielded structure.    The  B-52G's  OAS  (Offensive   Avionics
       System) is one of numerous studies directed primarily at testing the
       electronic hardening of military systems.

       The Future
       --- ------

       THE effects of  EMP  on  our  lives is becoming known to many on the
       North American continent  as it  is  being  discovered  by  all  the
       citizens of the free world.  Its political implications  are not the
       topic here, but  rather the facts in this article reveal to what EMP
       is and what it can do to the technological  devices we rely on every
       minute of the day.




                                      Page 9





       The next time a solar flare disrupts radio communications around the
       world for a few hours, or maybe a few days, recall that man with one
       nuclear device can outshine the damage old Sol creates by many fold.

       --------------------------------------------------------------------

       GLOSSARY OF TERMS
       -----------------

       ElectroMagnetic Pulse (EMP):  An electromagnetic field of high
            intensity and short duration that may be caused by a nuclear
            explosion.
                        -----------------------------------
       Electromagnetic Field:   A  magnetic  field  produced by electricity
            (the flow of current in a wire or electrons through a medium
            such as a vacuum). It is usually expressed in volts per meter.
                        -----------------------------------
       ElectroMagnetic Compatibility (EMC):  The  ability  of an electronic
            device to deal with electromagnetic interference  and  function
            properly.
                        -----------------------------------
       ElectroMagnetic Interference (EMI): Any adverse effect on electronic
            equipment due to an electromagnetic field.
                        -----------------------------------
       Shielding or Hardening:  A method used to protect electronic devices
            from EMP interruption or damage.
                        -----------------------------------

                      Written: Art Reichert / March 21, 1988

       --------------------------------------------------------------------

         If you  have comments or other information relating to such topics
         as  this paper covers,  please   upload to KeelyNet or send to the
           Vangard  Sciences  address  as  listed  on the  first  page.
              Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.

           Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
                             Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet

       --------------------------------------------------------------------
                     If we can be of service, you may contact
                 Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
       --------------------------------------------------------------------
















                                      Page 10



The entire AOH site is optimized to look best in Firefox® 3 on a widescreen monitor (1440x900 or better).
Site design & layout copyright © 1986- AOH
We do not send spam. If you have received spam bearing an artofhacking.com email address, please forward it with full headers to abuse@artofhacking.com.