>>> FLUSH 2 Text. <<<

THE BIG FLUSH (parallel dimensional equilibrium theory) Part 2.
by Rick Finney - April, 1995.

All the detail contained herein 
- excluding the original photographs/GIFs
  of Galaxies N1499, M 1 & M 31 - 
are copyright of/to Richard V Finney, April 17th, 1995. 
They may not be reproduced in part or full in any medium 
- audio, visual or data -
without the prior written permission of the author 
(Richard V Finney).

Contents:  >>Flush2.zip<<.
1. Flush2.TXT ... This file, explaining the theory.
2. PDS5.GIF ... Illustration #5.
3. PDS6.GIF ... Illustration #6.


The Big Flush ... an alternative (3rd) theory of cosmic reality
and creation ... PART 2.

Introduction ...
   Carrying on from last time (Flush #1), my wish is to
impart an idea/thought for discussion and development - 
rather than to present a finished theorem. 
Of the latter I doubt I have the time to finish this and think
it is presumptuous to imagine my feeble brain might compass
the works of greater people, the Cosmos and GOD. I simply wish
to impart a third (mine) conceptualisation of what creation/
the universe involves.

Dimensional Matrix.
  I have said most of what I wanted to in the notes on 
PDS5 & 6.GIF. By "permeable" ... I think that small density
matter, that is not yet large/dense enough to generate a
measurable magnetic field/polarisation, can pass freely
through the planar fields of the Dimensional Matrix - not
necessarily across dimensions, but certainly across spatial
confines in relative space.

  I think the strength (containment) of the planar fields
increases proportionally to the individual field strengths
generated by those bodies contained within. As illustrated in
PDS1.GIF and PDS2.GIF (Flush 1), a super confined focusing of
matter/energy (e.g. Black Hole/Singularity) can reach the
critical level/strength to stretch and break through such a
dimensional containment field. I am sure the latter does
happen and is what creates (new) galaxies.

  The plate of galaxy 'M 1' (PDS5.GIF), is consistent with a
very recent "big flush" event ... virtually looking into the
eye of the galaxial vortex from on top - as it begins to form.
Galaxy 'M 31' (Andromeda) illustrates the stabilised galaxial 
pattern (over millenniums), in the same way the force of a
potter's wheel may gradually flatten the hubs and
irregularities of the mass - or a pizza cook works-out a
 pastry by spinning it, until it is flat and the desired
 circumference.

Astronomers & Cosmologists.
  Those whose professional and/or private interest compasses
roving the heavens and a familiarity with galaxial bodies,
are far better placed than I - whose profession involves
popular representation and the investigation of popular 
misrepresentation (corruption) - to find further examples 
consistent with, or opposed to, the "big flush" 
conceptualisation. This is why I have 'passed the ball' in the
fashion I have. It is up to you and your superior ability, to
either criticise or better encapsulate, the postulations of a 
rank amateur. I simply feel the "big flush" is a better 
conceptualisation/explanation of how galaxies are formed, 
than the two (main) existing theories.

Primary Dimensions.
  KENNETH R. CODE, (CServe: 70571,1357) wrote as follows on
  15/04/95 12:28 AM >>>
 "Re:	Flush Theory
  I found your musings interesting, and invite you to rework
  them in terms of system energetics. 
  The creation story in Genesis 1, combined with the melting 
  of the elements in the "fervent heat" of James, seems to 
  invite us to view nature in terms of the energy and life
  inherent in the combinations of mass, length, and time, 
  otherwise known as fundamental units in physics."

  As stated at the beginning of the Flush 1 text, "I believe in 
GOD and beyond that I don't worry about the bits too hard to 
work-out or think about". This does, however, have some impact 
on speculations, in that I think there are six principle/primary
dimensional forces/factors ... nominally influenced but the six
days GOD spent doing the 'creation' thing. The negative side of
this is that according to the dimensional matrix speculation, I
would need a geometric polygon based on six primary lines ... 
or a Hexametric polygon. This won't work in current mathematics
and I spent an entire week-end (last Winter) cutting-out little
cardboard hexagons - to glue together as polygon facets - trying
to see if it was achievable using concave and/or convex facets. 
It simply doesn't work, although the cats love playing with the
bits. Incidentally I knew it did not work for solid planar
facets and was simply checking to see if it might be possible
with warped planar facets (dimensional fields).

  For this reason I say, 'I suspect six (6) dimensional factors',
but it could be up to ten - nominally six to nine. The polygon
illustrated in figure#1 of PDS6.GIF is a pentametric shape, as
are the structures in figure#2. It might be right (conceptually)
by accident, because I only used this shape as it could be drawn
(admittedly, not well) and basically convey what I was on about.

  Of biblical accounts ... I once got into trouble, as a Sunday-
school teacher, for telling my students about the theory of 
spontaneous generation - when telling them about Samson and the
Lion. I simply explained the most learned people of that age were
less educated than they (ten year olds) and that the carcass was
probably just fly-blown after a day or two. The story may have 
been embellished a bit - passed from father to son over many 
years - to make it more exciting, or to make it more easily
understood ... within the parameters of their (ancient) education.
Note: I didn't then, and still do not believe, you should fail to
      give children a balanced reference for their beliefs. They
      should be able to look at something truthfully from the 
      start and thus avoid having their belief structure eroded by
      time and/or greater awareness. Also - all my Sunday-school 
      students clearly understood and could apply the theory of
      spontaneous generation ... before they got to High School. 

Point ... 
  Those who scribed Genesis described the creation works of GOD
according to their perception/reality, rather than what might be
an adequate description of an observer with today's levels of
education, perception and understanding. This does not mean the
message is wrong - just subject to interpretation with a clear
perspective of how ancients may have described events, or detail
imparted, subject to their limited wider knowledge. That is - 
they did the best they could, but it is not beyond reappraisal 
and redefinition.

  I think the six days refers to the creation of the six primary 
(principle) dimensions that compass all creation. I believe "Life"
is life-force, which is an energy that is both thought and soul at
the same time. As it is an energy, it follows that when the current
physical form ages/dies - that life-force simply changes state and
becomes free within GOD's realm ... or Heaven. 

*  (Sorry about the digression, but it is relevant in one area and 
     I am far more 'at home' in metaphysics, than physics.)

  Anyway - this reveals what I conceptualise as one of the dimensional
forces of the matrix, which gives us:
  Length; Depth; Breadth; Time; and Life-force. 
I haven't a reasonable speculative clue on those other/s, just yet.

Anti-matter.
  I do not think anti-matter exists in the form currently commonly 
conceptualised, but I do believe when the focused matter (singularity)
breaks through the dimensional field, it immediately reverses its 
axial rotational nature - and fields - which would compass the 
magnetic polarity of its fields. I imagine this would also reverse the 
polarity of all material bodies and matter within a given vicinity, 
including smaller galaxies and solar systems.

  I understand some scientists believe the polarity of the Earth has 
been reversed in past ages and suspect the collection of samples from 
the Moon and other planets (in this solar system) would demonstrate 
the same events - at the same calculated time. I think this approximate 
polarisation reversal event date, may correspond to the estimated 
creation date of some galaxy within our dimensional sector.

Fermat's theorem.
  I think it will be important to determine the size/nature of the
dimensional planar fields - as illustrated in PDS1.GIF and PDS2.GIF -
at some future time; possibly to predict where "big flush" events are
likely to occur and perhaps (more practically) how long a dimensional
rift passage is likely to be.

I think the dimensional matrix and planar fields are like a glass door,
or the wind; once you know it is there, you can begin to calculate its 
nature, strength and thickness. I'll leave that to better minds and 
bigger computers, but I imagine - if someone said:
  "Right, lets just drive through this dimensional rift passage";
that various people (including those doing it) might like some idea of
the size of the undertaking and the time frame (relative) involved. 
Similarly "Space Rescue" might like to calculate what would be required
in time, fuel, etc. - to retrieve some space vessel that has accidentally 
strayed into an uncharted dimensional rift passage. This is where I 
suspect Fermat's and Lami's (extra measures/forces) theorems will 
come in handy in the future. 

Conclusion ...
  I think I've covered what I wanted to, and sorry if I've missed anything.
The new (small) margins are because Suzi [New Age librarian] suggested it
was what she wanted and my limbs would be independently articulated if I
did not comply.
  Please understand that this part (Flush 2) is total speculation,
provided to explain how/why the conceptualisation ("big flush" theory) was
framed as it is and to clarify my thoughts on related matters. If nothing else, 
it is possibly useful to budding science-fiction writers.
  To all those who, like Ken, have sent a comment or view. I am answering
as quickly as I can.

  I think humanity is on the verge of a staggering leap forward in
knowledge and development, because of the facility to communicate and
exchange ideas, via mediums such as CompuServe. To a greater or lesser 
extent establishments such as Universities have greatly limited the wider
development of, and popular involvement in, intellectual discussion and
development of knowledge. A medium of exchange, basically free of the 
traditional structuring and limitations of academia, allows all to become
involved in the compilation and development of humanities' knowledge.
This is the single greatest achievement of humanity in two thousand years.

Cheers...

RICK.