AOH :: SWEET4B.TXT
Vacuum, spacetime, frame, and all that
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
March 1, 1992
SWEET4B.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Guy Resh.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vacuum, Spacetime, Frame, and All That
You also have to make the notion of "spacetime" less mysterious.
It's just vacuum, by the way, and potential, and energy. It's
also used in two different senses: (1) In general, when a
specific frame has not been imposed or selected, and (2) in
specific, when a specific frame has been imposed and selected.
When the specific frame is imposed, you've already assumed that
you know the conditions and ordering of the vacuum for the whole
universe, that the distance between every two points (and the
time between them) has been rigorously measured and determined
and fixed, etc. You've already assumed the fundamental operation
of the entire universe, its physics, everything! So beware of
thinking just in a fixed frame. In that sort of thinking, you've
got a lot of built-in, sweeping, global assumptions that will
elude your recognition unless you're careful. Many scientists
don't realize this. They think in one frame at a time, and then
make grand pronouncements about the entire nature of the
universe, not realizing that they already assumed those answers
in the first place.
So watch out for the trap of assuming that "space" and
"spacetime" and "vacuum" are all synonymous with "frame" and
"spacetime frame." They're not. Vacuum per se doesn't have any
fixed length and time; the observer's mass reaction with the
vacuum potential determines and makes those quantities.
The Speed of Light Is Not a Universal Constant
The speed of light in vacuum is also not a universal constant.
[46] Sorry about that. The speed of light in a given, specific
vacuum of specific potential magnitude is constant. Note that to
first order the vacuum is just electrostatic scalar potential and
therefore just virtual photon flux. The intensity of VPF flux is
the electrical charge density. So the speed of light in a given,
specific vacuum of specific electrical charge is constant. But
if you change the vacuum's ambient electrical charge density __
i.e., change the value of that vacuum potential's magnitude __
you can make light passing through go faster or slower, depending
upon whether you decreased or increased the vacuum charge
density. [47]
Page 1
In fact, you can make local time go much faster or much slower,
if you take the time to substantially activate the mass
potential, because the VPF exchange between vacuum and mass
(nucleus) is far greater in the mass potential than in any other
kind of potential. I was once involved in an unplanned
experiment where, after several hours of Frank Golden's charging
the area with two powerful scalar EM wave generators, we messed
up all the clocks in the area __ grandfather mechanical pendulum
clocks, electric watches and clocks, mechanical windup clocks and
watches, battery-operated clocks, everything __ because we
altered the ambient "mass potential" of the area. We charged up
or activated all the local mass, and in doing so we made a zone
in which time flowed at a somewhat different rate. There were
other phenomena which I am not at liberty to discuss. It
required four days for the activation to discharge, and things to
return to normal.
The Multiple Nature of "the" Ambient Vacuum
Another problem is that "the" ambient laboratory vacuum we
normally have or consider is really jillions and jillions of
vacua, simultaneously, in interference with each other.
Spacetime, to the first order you see, is just electrostatic
scalar potential. (It's just scalar potential, to nth order,
without restriction to considering just virtual photons and
electromagnetics.). Since that potential isn't adequately
defined in physics or EE either, I'm sending some papers with
proper definitions.
Actually, scalar potentials (Vacua! Spacetimes!) from charged
particles __ both static and dynamic __ all over the universe are
continually interfering in each differential volume of the
observer's spacetime. Whittaker's first paper tells us how the
hidden EM energy flows between any point and every other point in
the universe, right through each of these potentials from distant
sources. By Whittaker's 2nd paper (1904), the local interference
of these potentials generates continual scalar potential
gradients __ EM forcefields, if you will, when you stick a
measuring charge in the gradient to provide observable charged
particle translation [which is what the E-field, e.g., is defined
in terms of]. The rapidity of the interfering changes in the
local vacuum potentials is phenomenal, but the interference is
totally deterministic. However, all the fine-grained information
is totally lost to the observer. Hence it appears to him to be
statistical.
Generation of Zero-Point EM Fluctuations
Note that, in the differential of local spacetime vacuum that we
are examining, "the" vacuum/potential is actually incredible
numbers of dynamically changing vacua/potentials, all in violent
interferometry a la Whittaker's second paper. In other words,
"the" ambient vacuum is really not just "a" single vacuum, but
many, many, many dynamic vacua all at once, and all in
interference. By Whittaker 1904, their interference (as scalar
potentials) is what deterministically produces the local highly
noisy virtual EM field gradients __ the zero-point EM energy of
the quantum mechanical vacuum.
Page 2
Puthoff's Cosmological Feedback Principle
Puthoff referred to this vacuum situation of individually
deterministic but conglomerated statistical local EM fluctuation
effects, from the potential energies of the distant charged
particles of the universe, as a cosmological feedback principle.
You should also read Puthoff's articles, as cited in my papers,
and perhaps some of his references dealing with the exploding
field of stochastic electrodynamics (SED). The only present
problem with SED is that its practitioners have not yet
discovered Whittaker's two papers (1903 and 1904), and therefore
do not incorporate nature's highly organized internal
electromagnetics.
Adding a Potential to "the" Vacuum Potential
When you make "a" potential, you make "a single"
spacetime/vacuum. That's sitting on top of (adding to the
magnitude of), or lowered into (decreasing the magnitude of), the
conglomerated "ambient vacuum potential" that is the "normal
vacuum." That added scalar EM potential is a beautifully
organized, EM, spatiotemporal lattice, per Whittaker's 1903
paper. It's filled with organized, phase-locked, EM energy
waves; it is not a random mishmash at all. You must understand
that. You can organize and engineer local spacetime itself, and
even do it at a distance.
Solution to the Missing Chaos of Quantum Mechanics
In fact, when you add a potential to the ambient vacuum (to the
ambient vacuum potential), you add something that is perfectly
ordered to the statistical "ambient vacua." Thus you have added
hidden order into the local statistics. That's the missing chaos
in quantum mechanics __ the hidden order that everyone's been
desperately looking for.
Spacetime Is Energy
At any rate, the ambient vacuum is "spacetime," and is (to first
order) a conglomerated scalar EM potential, of very high value.
Please read that statement again. Then read the definitions of
energy, scalar potential, and electrostatic scalar potential,
that we have included in a footnote to this paper. Notice that
vacuum/spacetime is pure energy __ and to first order, pure EM
energy. So we are like a bird on an electrical high line; we
live directly in an extremely high potential, but not in a
potential gradient. That's a flat spacetime; it has the same
ambient "potential" magnitude everywhere. If you change the
ambient potential of the local vacuum from point to point in the
neighborhood, that's a curved local spacetime. Imagine ST
curvature as a change in the "virtual ambient pressure" of the
local vacuum. That "ambient pressure" can be increased or
decreased, hence the two "curvatures." Simple as that. You can
curve it in two ways: (1) increase the local ambient value of the
vacuum potential, or (2) decrease the local ambient value of the
vacuum potential. So local ST curvature really isn't any big
deal. And you can do it on the lab bench.
Page 3
Trapped EM Energy Is Gravitational Potential
As is well-known in general relativity, it is the trapped energy
in mass that is responsible for its exhibiting gravitational
attraction. Again, Einstein's E = mc(exp2) is a prescription for
the amount of electromagnetic energy that is trapped in a mass m.
An electrostatic scalar potential is just one where the EM energy
is trapped (see the first Whittaker paper, 1903, for the EM wave
form in which it is trapped). So if trapped energy is
gravitational in mass, it is gravitational in the potential as
well. In GR, all potentials are therefore gravitational. In
fact, there is no such separate thing as "the" gravitational
potential; "the" G-potential is made from a conglomerate of other
fields/field effects, which is Sakharov's hypothesis [48]. To
first order, the G-potential is a function of the trapped local
EM energy density of the vacuum.
The Quantum Potential: Action At a Distance
You must also at least get acquainted with the quantum potential,
and its place in hidden variable quantum mechanics theory. The
quantum potential (QP) is a potential added to the Schroedinger
potential. It provides an instantaneous connection between
separated components, even over great distances. The QP appears
to have no point source, in sharp contrast to the classical
potential. The QP field is not radiated in the classical sense.
In general the QP between two particles (or two components of a
system exhibiting a macroscopic QP) does not produce a vanishing
interaction between the particles (or components) as their
spatial separation becomes very large. The QP contains an
instantaneous connection between separated components of the
system, rather than the retarded connection provided by the
classical potential. Thus with a QP, two widely separated
components of a physical system may be strongly and directly
connected. The QP of a system depends on the quantum state of
the system as a whole, even when its parts are greatly separated.
In the case of a QP established by separated electronic
equipments, the QP depends on the "structured graviton" state of
all the radiative components, circuits, devices, transmitters,
etc. [49][50]
As Trapped EM Energy, Mass Is a Special Scalar EM Potential
Since (see definitions in the footnotes to this paper) trapped EM
energy is also a scalar EM potential, then it follows that the
mass (of the nucleus or a fundamental particle) can be regarded
as, and is, a special kind of very, very intense scalar EM
potential. I call it the mass potential to differentiate it
because of its fantastic strength. Not only is the mass
potential a scalar EM potential, but it is also a gravitational
potential. Note that the concept of the mass potential is a
unifying field concept, for unifying gravity and EM fields.
The beauty of the mass potential concept is fourfold: (1) Now
mass has a universal kind of organized EM internal structure,
given by Whittaker's 1903 paper, that comprises the mass in the
first place, (2) the hidden internal EM structure of the mass
potential can be changed and engineered at will,
electromagnetically, by external means and directly, (3) we now
Page 4
have direct electrogravitation, opening up the vista of directly
engineering antigravity (as Sweet has already proven in his
vacuum triode device) [51], and (4) the internal structure of the
nuclear mass potential can be deliberately altered in a
nonequilibrium manner vis a vis its virtual photon flux (VPF)
exchange with its local vacuum, as can be the VPF of the local
vacuum itself. In that case, you have created a local vacuum
engine in the altered Whittaker vacuum/potential, and you have
also created an activated interacting engine of the altered
atomic nucleus (its mass potential), fed by vacuum energy, and
gating the energy out of the atom to do marvelous things __ to do
whatever you've been clever enough to design it to do in the
first place! You can transmute elements, materialize and
dematerialize matter, alter and change a radioactive nucleus's
energy balance and characteristics so that it is inert, etc.
Gravitational Energy Is Negative Energy
Finally, you must be aware that gravitational energy is negative
energy, since it is "withdrawn" from the EM scattering energy
domain, and scattering EM energy has been designated as positive.
You can understand that G-energy is negative, in this fashion,
after Nahin [52]: If two like electrical charges are brought
together, energy is required to overcome the repulsion, and this
energy "goes into the field" to give a positive energy density of
space. Two positive masses, however, attract each other; it
takes the exertion of energy to keep them apart. In other words,
the field energy is negative in this case. [53] Maxwell was much
perplexed by this problem, as was Heaviside __ and as have been
many other physicists.
Engineering Physical Reality Itself
In summary of this scalar EM approach, there are literally no
limits that cannot be overcome. It just requires us to now
explore and develop the phenomenology, advance the theory and
approach, learn how to design and implement what we wish the
activated mass and activated vacuum to do, etc. We can change
the so-called "laws of nature" in an area __ or even for the
whole earth __ as we wish, using this approach. It doesn't
matter whether we're ready for it or not; the Creator has now
laid in our hands the power to alter and engineer physical
reality itself, as we may wish.
Nonlinear Oscillation
One also needs to be aware of nonlinear oscillator theory. [54]
One will encounter in scalar EM the effects of nonlinear
oscillation, including harmonic and subharmonic oscillation,
self-oscillation, etc. The organized graviton structure of a
scalar potential is organized (and in fact phase-locked) in terms
of both harmonic and subharmonic oscillation.
Mind and Matter and Their Interaction
Without further amplification, we will also state that mind,
matter, thought, and the deepest living biological control
functions also utilize the Whittaker internal electromagnetics,
and have done so since the beginning. We now know where the
Page 5
software is, how it is filed, and how to go about engineering it
directly. We have already advanced the precise mechanism for
Sheldrake's morphogenetic field, and explained how it generates a
change in a species in a complete evolutionary "jump." We state
without further elaboration that specific, testable mechanisms
for parapsychology can also be extracted from the scalar EM
approach. What is involved here is not only a unification of the
branches of physics, but also a unification of physics and
metaphysics.
Biological Effects of EM Fields and Radiation
As is well-known, the question of whether or not EM fields and
radiation may contribute to incidences of leukemia, brain tumors,
and other health changes is unresolved. Four decades of the best
technical efforts of many able researchers, together with the
entire body of experimental data they have gathered, has been
unable to technically and decisively resolve the issue. The
studies and experiments have continued to be contradictory and
inconsistent, and replication of results has continued to be
difficult and often impossible. What the experimental results
actually show is that there are uncontrolled and unknown EM
variables in the experiments, hence in the experimental model
being applied __ either consciously or unconsciously __ by the
experimenters.
The standard experimental model (SEM) that EM/bioeffects
researchers apply, either wittingly or unwittingly, rests on two
major postulates, that: (1) the present theoretical model of
electromagnetics is correct and complete, and sufficient to
characterize both the EM stimulus to the biological system and
the causative mechanism for biological effects, and (2) the gross
EM dosage/response model __ energy deposition, or "heat" by
another name __ used in the measurement instrumentation
adequately characterizes EM stimulus/bioresponse, for measuring
and interpreting the factors and results of the experiments.
Both fundamental postulates are seriously in error, and the
standard experimental model is therefore seriously invalid.
Using the SEM by rote for four and a half decades has resulted in
the present state of confusion, inconclusiveness, conflict, and
indeterminacy in the field. Mostly what the experimenters have
really shown to date is that: (1) their own experimental model is
hopelessly flawed, (2) their instruments and instrumental methods
are inadequate, and (3) the classical EM theoretical model is
inadequate for their experimental tasks.
Living systems have long used the internal EM Whittaker channel
for deep cellular control of the organism. By manipulating this
channel, Kaznacheyev [55] showed EM induction of cellular death
and disease into environmentally protected cell cultures. [56]
Priore [57] demonstrated __ under rigorous scientific controls
[58] __ absolute cures of terminal tumors and leukemias in
laboratory animals. Popp [59] also discovered the master
cellular control system, including its virtual photon storage
characteristics, without knowing of the internal Whittaker
storage channel and mechanism.
Page 6
Quantum mechanically it has been known since 1959 that the EM
potentials are the primary causes of electromagnetic phenomena,
[60] and the force fields are only secondary __ the exact
opposite of what has been assumed in the classical EM theory
utilized by present experimenters in the SEM. Whittaker's
fundamental decomposition of the scalar EM potential into an
internal harmonic set of paired bidirectional planar EM waves
provides a rich set of experimentally and theoretically
unaccounted and uncontrolled hidden EM variables involved in all
EM bioeffects experiments to date. The scalar EM potential is an
organized spacetime lattice of perfectly ordered EM energy,
passing through it in a Whittaker wave structure. Living systems
alter this internal EM Whittaker channel (this spacetime lattice
structure) and communicate through it for mind, thought,
personality, long-term memory, and deep control of cellular and
body functions. All the deepest biological control systems are
in the Whittaker channel. To understand environmental-EM
bioeffects, you've got to understand how the local environmental
EM (both internal and external) affects and alters the Whittaker
channel, and hence the deep biocontrol systems utilizing it.
These hidden Whittaker EM variables are real; that is testable
and unassailable. The unknown Whittaker EM variables also
account for most if not all the serious deficiencies and problems
of the entire experimental field to date. Scalar interferometry
of Whittaker potentials alone, e.g., can reproduce any kind of
normal EM, [61] and the potentials can pass deep into the body
before that interference occurs. So Whittaker potential
interferometry can produce much deeper EM fields in the body than
present field theory and dosimetry would indicate. Even worse,
the Whittaker potentials interact in the nuclear mass potential
of the body __ and that is where the signals and functions for
deep cellular control, immune system control, etc. are located.
Interfering EM signals (multiphoton effects) in the external
environment create sporadic Whittaker potentials, with "noisy"
and often abnormally strong EM hidden variable structures.
Repetitious noise patterns in the Whittaker channel gradually
"activate" or "charge up" the Whittaker channel of the organism.
Thus a sort of long-term "electronic jamming" of the deep control
systems of the body can result. Gradual degradation of the
immune system and of the cellular control system can result.
Thus there does exist a mechanism for long-term, cumulative
damage to the biological system.. The basic probability of the
multiphoton mechanism occurring for long-term effects cumulation
and slow bio-degradation is primarily a function of the signal
density in the specific environment, regardless of individual
signal strength or frequency. This "electronic smog" effect is
presently unknown in biophysics, and it has not been accounted
for at all in the present experiments and studies in the EM
bioeffects field. Long-term presence of specific multifrequency
mixtures then can produce more specific short-term, medium-term,
and long-term effects, in addition to the general degradation
cumulating from sheer local environmental signal densities.
Submitted for consideration to a major 1992 scientific symposium
is a paper pointing out the fundamental difficulties with the
standard experimental model, and the exact Whittaker nature of
the uncontrolled hidden variables responsible for negating over
four decades of painstaking scientific experiments. Also the
Page 8
paper points out the precise things that have to be done to
correct the SEM, the instrumentation, and the EM theoretical
model, so that future experiments will be decisive, consistent,
and replicable.
If the paper is accepted, then in August 1992 we will place into
the scientific literature precisely what is wrong with the EM
bioeffects field to date, and will attempt to correct the entire
field by stimulating it to account for and measure the internal
EM Whittaker variables that are presently hidden and
uncontrolled. With such correction, hopefully we can avoid yet
another four decades of indeterminate, inconclusive,
inconsistent, and contradictory experimental effort, and also
remove much of the present researcher frustration.
Aristotelian Logic and Excessive Worship of Mathematics
One will also desperately need to change one's mindset on
Aristotelian logic __ which nature often violates __ and one must
get rid of the false notion that "mathematics contains
fundamental truth, a priori." Mathematics is just a game and a
model __ though a very, very useful one __ based on assumptions
(postulates) which we ourselves formulate and build-in to it.
The only real "truth content" of the mathematics is judged by the
validity of the postulates. Mathematics is no better or worse
than the concepts assumed as its basis. If there's any truth in
it, it's only what we ourselves have put into it. That's the
reason for the experimental method in science; the only way a
theory can be falsified or validated is by experimental
examination and test.
So get rid of the artificial mystique of "mathematics is truth,
and the purest activity of the human mind." That's dogma and
religion, not science. It is a must to read Morris Kline. [62]
Also read about G. Spencer Brown's extension of logic to include
complex numbers. [63] Then read my own fundamental correction
to Aristotelian logic by addition of a fourth law and an
applications rule. [64] With this background, one should be free
from the "Aristotelian trap" and the unwarranted "worship of
mathematics" trap. We need the mathematics as a useful tool; but
we must not think that to be highly mathematical is to
necessarily have an advanced grip on the truth. In physics
today, too often one loses the real physics because of the over
attachment to the beauty of the mathematics.
The physics of a theory is embodied in the fundamental concepts
associated with the mathematical symbols, not in the mathematical
manipulation of those symbols. The mathematics isn't the
physics; the math is just the manipulation of the physics. Don't
confuse the fundamental physics of a theory with the mathematics
of the theory. The mathematics can be great, and the physics
still quite wrong.
Background For a New Paradigm
The above "blast" should give you a feel for my work, and the
background for the area. In your normal studies, you will also
get a course in special relativity, certainly by the time you get
your master's degree. If you major in physics, you will also
Page 8
take one or more courses in general relativity in the curriculum
for the doctorate. For either the master's or doctorate degrees,
you will probably have at least one introductory course in
quantum mechanics, or perhaps more. That's quite sufficient for
understanding in this area and working in it. To assist a shift
in mindset, however, one also needs to read __ particularly at
the beginning __ a lot of popularized Scientific American type
articles on quantum mechanics, the vacuum, zero-point energy of
vacuum, etc. Also read the popularized books by Heinz Pagels and
Nick Herbert's Quantum Reality. Read them at least two or three
times. Read Paul Davies' books; even though popularized, he is a
master craftsman, and able to clearly state the gist of the broad
array of present physics. In all of your reading, it's just as
important to notice what is wrong, awkward, assumed, or imperfect
as it is to notice what is known correctly. If you haven't read
a good book on foundations of physics, at least read Lindsay and
Margenau. [65]
Personals
As far as your career plans, it would be best to either seek your
Doctorate in EE as you plan to, with a minor in physics, or else
major in physics with a minor in something else such as EE. Just
keep your mind open and not brainwashed, in either case. If you
stay open-minded, most of your learning is going to occur after
your doctorate anyway.
Thanks for your interest, and the best of luck to you. And yes,
more and more youngsters, grad students, post-docs, and even
a few senior professors are turning to this scalar potential EM,
and I'm absolutely delighted. As they digest the Whittaker
papers and the other papers, gradually they'll start to work and
change physics. That's the only way we're going to get a new
science. As Max Planck pointed out, essentially the only way you
get a new physics is when the old physicists who so adamantly
oppose and block it die off. The future will be determined by
the young.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 9
Call THC BBS: +1 604 361 1464 HST 1:340/26 Over 6,200 Text Files!
"Reach for the edges of your mind"
The entire AOH site is optimized to look best in Firefox® 3 on a widescreen monitor (1440x900 or better).
Site design & layout copyright © 1986- AOH
We do not send spam. If you have received spam bearing an artofhacking.com email address, please forward it with full headers to abuse@artofhacking.com.
