AOH :: BIKES-1.FAQ

Bicycles FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) 1/5


Archive-name: bicycles-faq/part1

Last modified:  June 17, 1994


Answers to Rec.Bicycles' Frequently Asked Questions and Interesting Information

The following monthly posting contains the answers to frequently asked
questions posed to rec.bicycles and interesting information that cyclists
might find useful.  Some of the answers are from postings to rec.bicycles,
and and some are condensed from postings.  Answers include the name and
email address of the author.  If no author is listed, I'm the guilty party.
If you're the author and I've misspelled your name or have the wrong email
address, let me know and I'll fix it.

If you have something you feel should be included in the FAQ, please write
it up and send it to me at the address below.

Note: I don't read each and every posting to rec.bicycles.*, so suggesting
that something be included in the FAQ may not be seen.  If you want
something included, summarize the discussion and send me the summary.

This FAQ is posted to rec.bicycles.misc, news.answers, and rec.answers
around the 15th of the month.  It is also available via anonymous ftp from:

   draco.acs.uci.edu   /pub/rec.bicycles/faq.*
   rtfm.mit.edu        /pub/usenet/rec.bicycles.misc
   ugle.unit.no        /local/biking/faq*

Check the "Archives" section for information on how to obtain the FAQ via
email.


Mike Iglesias
iglesias@draco.acs.uci.edu

===========================================================================

Quick Index:
(* means section hasn't been written yet.  ! means updated since last
FAQ.  + means new section.)

Administrivia
  Abbreviations
  Gopher and World Wide Web access
! Archives
  Posting Guidelines
! Electronic Mailing Lists

Rides
  Maps
  Touring supplies
  Taking a bike on Amtrak
  Warm Showers List

Racing
  Tour de France Jerseys
  Major Tour Winners  1947-1993
  Rating Tour de France climbs

Social
  Bicycling in America
  League of American Bicyclists

Marketplace
  Marketplace hints/guidlines
  Bike Trailers
  One Less Car T-Shirts
  Panniers and Racks
  Clothing
  Seats
  Women's Saddles
  Women's Bikes
! Bike Rentals
  Bike Lockers
  Bike Computer Features
! Recumbent Bike Info
  More Recumbent Bike Info
  Buying a Bike

Tech
  Ball Bearing Grades
  SIS Cables
  Milk Jug Mud Flaps
  Lubrication
  Wear and Gear Slipping
  Adjusting Chain Length
  Hyperglide Chains
  Bottom Bracket Info
  Crank Noise
  Cracking/Breaking Cranks
  Biopace Chainrings
  Snakebite flats
  Blown Tube
  Mounting Tires
  More Flats on Rear Tires
  What holds the rim off the ground?
  Anodized vs. Non-anodized Rims
  Reusing Spokes
  Clinchers vs. Tubulars
  Presta Valve Nuts
  Ideal Tire Sizes
  Center Pivot vs. Dual Pivot brakes
  Indexed Steering
  Seat adjustments
  Cleat adjustments
  SIS derailleur adjustments
  Where to buy tools
  Workstands
  Workstands 2
  Frame stiffness comparison
  Frame materials
  Bike pulls to one side
  Frame repair
  Frame Fatigue
  Weight = Speed?
  Adjusting SPD Cleats
  Rim Tape Summary
  STI/Ergo Summary
  Roller Head Bearings
  Tubular Tire Repair
  Cassette or Freewheel hubs
  "Sealed" Bearings
+ Installing Cranks
+ Stress Relieving Spokes

Misc
  Books and Magazines
  Mail Order Addresses
  Technical Support Numbers
  Road Gradient Units
  Helmets
  Terminology
  Avoiding Dogs
  Shaving Your Legs
  Contact Lenses and Cycling
  How to deal with your clothes
  Pete's Winter Cycling Tips
  Nancy's Cold/Wet Cycling Tips
  Studded Tires
  Cycling Myths
  Descending I
  Descending II
  Trackstands
  Front Brake Usage
  Slope Wind, the invisible enemy
  Reflective Tape
  Nutrition Primer
  Nuclear Free Energy Bar recipe
  Powerbars
  Calories burned by cycling
  Road rash
  Knee problems
  Cycling Psychology
  Mirrors

===========================================================================
Administrivia
===========================================================================

Abbreviations

Some common abbreviations used here and in rec.bicycles.*:

  FAQ  Frequenly Asked Question.  What you are reading now is a file
       containing answers to some FAQs.

  IMHO  In my humble opinion.

  TIOOYK  There Is Only One You Know.  Refers to the Tour de France.

See the glossary in the ftp archives for more bicycle-related terms.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gopher and World Wide Web access

I've made the rec.bicycles ftp archives available via gopher, and have
split the FAQ up into individual files for easier access via gopher.

To connect to the gopher server, use the hostname draco.acs.uci.edu and
port 1071.  Please don't ask me how to use gopher or how to configure
your gopher client; I don't know how to use all the available gopher
clients, nor do I have access to them.  Please talk to your local gopher
gurus.

You can also access the archives via NCSA Mosaic, using this URL:

   gopher://draco.acs.uci.edu:1071

Again, please ask your local gurus for information on how to use Mosaic
clients.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Archives

I've made available via anonymous ftp a copy of the current FAQ and a
few other items on draco.acs.uci.edu (128.200.34.12).  This is the
workstation on my desk, so I'd appreciate it if people would restrict
their use to 7pm-7am Pacific time.  The files are in pub/rec.bicycles.

For those without Internet access, you can use the ftpmail server at
gatekeeper.dec.com to get copies of items in the archives.  I really don't
have time to email copies of files to people who can't get at them easily.
To use the ftpmail server, send an email message containing the line

help

in the body of the message to ftpmail@gatekeeper.dec.com.  You'll get
a help file back with more information on how to use the ftpmail server.

Here is an example of what to put in the body of a message to to get the
README file:

connect draco.acs.uci.edu
chdir pub/rec.bicycles
get README


                README for Rec.Bicycles Anonymous FTP area

arnie.light     Arnie Berger's (arnie@col.hp.com) "Ultimate bike light"

bike_gear.sea.hqx
                Lawrence Hare's (ldh@duck.svl.cdc.com) copy of a
                Hypercard stack to calculate gearing.  Lawrence says
                there is a newer version on major bbs systems.

bike.lockers    David H. Wolfskill's (david@dhw68k.cts.com) summary of
                bike locker vendors.

bike.painting   Sam Henry's (shenry@rice.edu) collection of articles on
                how to paint a bike.

bike_power.*    Ken Roberts program to calculate power output and power
                consumption.  See bike_power.doc for more info.
                updated by Mark Grennan (markg@okcforum.oknorm.edu)

biking_log.*    Phil Etheridge's (phil@massey.ac.nz) hypercard stack
                riding diary.  It keeps track of dates, distance, time,
                average speed, etc., and keeps running weekly, monthly,
                and yearly totals.  See biking_log.read_me for more
                information.

bmb.ride        Pamela Blalock's (pamela@keps.com) report on her 1992
                Boston-Montreal-Boston ride.

CA-veh-code     A directory containing the California vehicle code sections
                that pertain to bicycles and gopher bookmarks.  See the
                README in that directory for more information.

camera.tour     Vivian Aldridge's (viviana@tamri.com) collection of articles
                on cameras to take on a bike tour.

competitive.nutrition
                Roger Marquis' (marquis@well.uucp) article from the
                Feb 91 Velo News on nutrition and cycling.

cyclesense.tex  Larry Watanabe's (watanabe@asimov.cs.uiuc.edu) copy of
                the "Cycle Sense for Motorists" ready to run thru LaTeX.

faq.*           The current Frequently Asked Questions posting

first.century   Pamela Blalock's (pamela@keps.com) tips on training
                for your first century ride.

frame.build     Terry Zmrhal's (terryz@microsoft.com) writeup of
                a frame building class he took.

glossary        Alan Bloom's (alanb@sr.hp.com) glossary of bicycle terms.

lab.info        Erin O'Brien's (bikeleague@aol.com) article on the
                League of American Bicyclists.

lights          Tom Reingold's (tr@samadams.princeton.edu) collection of
                articles on bike lights.

lights2         More articles from rec.bicycles.* on lights.

mtb.buy         Joakim Karlsson's (aviator@mv.mv.com) article on
                buying an entry-level MTB.

pam.pactour     Pamela Blalock's (pamela@keps.com) writeup of her PAC tour
                across the country.

pbp.info        Pamela Blalock's (pamela@keps.com) information
                on her Paris-Brest-Paris ride.

pictures        Bicycling gif pictures.

prof.sched      Roland Stahl's (stahl@ipi.uni-hannover.de) list of
                scheduled professional races in many countries.

pwm.regulator   Jeff Bell's (jlbell@presto.eecs.umich.edu) reposting of
                an article from another newsgroup by William Hunt on
                a pulse width modulated voltage regulator.

ride.index      Chris Hull's/Bill Bushnell's (bushnell@lmsc.lockheed.com)
                explanation of a way to "index" rides and compare the
                difficulty of different rides.

ridelg22.*      Found on AOL by Gary Thurman (thurmag@csos.orst.edu), a
                ride diary program.  The .exe file a self-extracting archive
                for PCs.

spike.bike      Bob Fishell's (spike@cbnewsd.att.com) Spike Bike series.
                They are numbered in the order that Bob posted them to
                rec.bicycles.  All the Spike Bike stories are
                "Copyright 1989 by Robert Fishell, all rights reserved."

spokelen11.bas  Roger Marquis' (marquis@well.uucp) spoke length
                calculator, written in Microsoft Quickbasic.

spokelen.c      Andy Tucker's (tucker@Neon.Stanford.EDU) port of
                Roger Marquis' spokelen11.bas to C.

spokelen.hqx    Eric Topp's topp@roses.stanford.edu's Hypercard stack that
                computes spoke lengths.

studded.tires   Nancy Piltch's (piltch@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov) compilation
                of messages on studded tires, including how to make your
                own.

tandem.boxes    Arnie Berger's (arnie@col.hp.com) notes on how
                he built a box to transport his tandem to Europe and
                back.  It's taken from a longer travelogue on his trip - if
                you want more information, contact him at the above
                address.

tech.supp.phone Joshua Putnam's (josh@Happy-Man.com) list of technical
                support numbers for various manufacturers.  This list
                used to be in the FAQ but now is too long to include there.

trailers        A summary posting of messages about bike trailers.  Good
                stuff if you're thinking of buying a trailer.

wheels.*.hqx    R. Scott Truesdell's (truesdel@ics.uci.edu) Hypercard
                stack to calculate spoke lengths.  See wheels.readme
                for more info.

wintertips      Pete Hickey's (pete@panda1.uottawa.ca) notes about
                how to cycle in the winter.

wintertips.pam  Pamela Blalock's (pamela@keps.com) winter cycling tips.


Files available via anonymous ftp from ugle.unit.no (129.241.1.97) in the
directory local/biking. This directory is maintained by Joern Dahl-Stamnes
(dahls@fysel.unit.no).

Last updated: July 3rd, 1994.

File            What
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
READ.ME         Information about the other files in the directory.

bm106a.zip      The latest version of Bike Manager. Bike Manager is a
                shareware program that help you keep a log of your training
                activities. It can report summary reports,  weekly reports,
                monthly reports and yearly reports. Features to analyze your
                activities against your goals. And more...

brake.doc       About how to make your own brake booster.

gtos91.doc      A story from The Great Trial of Strength 1991.

gtos92.doc      Same, but for the 1992 trial.

gtos93.doc      For the 1993 trial.

toj93.doc       The Tour of Jotunheimen 1993 report.

faq.*           Answers to Rec.Bicycles' Frequently Asked Questions and
                Interesting  Information (ASCII text format).


velo.txt        Description about Velocipede (TM) for Windows.

velo*.zip       Velocipede (TM) for Windows. Velocipede is a window based
                training log program based on the ideas in Bike Manager.
                Compared to Bike Manager, Velocipede offers a better user
                interface, graphic presentation and more. For more details,
                see file velo.txt.
                Velocipede is a shareware program.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posting Guidelines

The rec.bicycles subgroups are described below - please try to post your
article to the appropriate group.  The newsgroups were designed to minimize
cross posting, so please take the time to think about the most appropriate
newsgroup and post your article there.

There have been several postings recently advocating a MTB-only newsgroup
(with the usual "Me Too!" followups).  There are arguments both for and
against doing this;  readers who want to start a new newsgroup are
advised to look in news.announce.newusers for the periodic postings on
how to create a newsgroup instead of filling up rec.bicycles.* with
postings about it.

rec.bicycles: DO NOT USE THIS NEWSGROUP - it should have been dropped
   from news servers, having been replaced by rec.bicycles.misc.

rec.bicycles.marketplace: Bicycles, components, ancillary equipment and
   services wanted or for sale, reviews of such things, places to buy
   them, and evaluations of these sources.  Not for discussion of general
   engineering, maintenance, or repair -- see rec.bicycles.tech.

rec.bicycles.tech: Techniques of engineering, construction, maintenance
   and repair of bicycles and ancillary equipment.  Not for products or
   services offered or wanted -- see rec.bicycles.marketplace.

rec.bicycles.rides: Discussions of tours and training or commuting routes.
   Not for disussion of general riding techniques -- see rec.bicycles.misc.

rec.bicycles.soc: Social issues, cycling transportation advocacy, laws,
   conduct of riders and drivers; road hazards such as potholes, dogs, and
   sociopaths.

rec.bicycles.racing: Race results, racing techniques, rules, and
   organizations.  Not racing equipment -- see rec.bicycles.marketplace
   or rec.bicycles.tech.

rec.bicycles.misc:  General riding techniques, rider physiology,
   injuries and treatment, diets, and other cycling topics.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Electronic Mailing lists

tandem@hobbes.ucsd.edu  A mailing list for tandem bicycle enthusiasts.
        Suitable topics include questions and answers related to tandem
        componentry, riding technique, brands and equipment selection,
        prices, clubs, rides and other activities, cooperating on a section
        on tandems for the rec.bicycles.* FAQ, etc.  For more information
        send mail to "tandem-request@hobbes.ucsd.edu".

BOB is the Bridgestone Owner's Bunch, and this is the internet
        edition of it.  This is a mailing list, not a newsletter, and has no
        connection with the real Bridgestone-sponsored BOB except in name and
        in spirit.  Get more information by sending mail to
        bob-request@cs.washington.edu.

HPV list  The HPV list is for the discussion of issues related to the
          design, construction, and operation of human powered vehicles
          and closely related kin. (Hybrid  human/electric, for example.)

          For further information, send a mail message containing the
          following single line in the message, to listserv@sonoma.edu:

          info hpv

BICYCLE on LISTSERV@BITNIC.BITNET
        or LISTSERV@BITNIC.EDUCOM.EDU

   The BICYCLE list was formed to provide a forum for cyclists to
   discuss all topics related to bicycles, mtn.  biking, and cycling in
   general.  This is NOT the place to discuss issues related to
   motorcycling.

   To subscribe to BICYCLE send the following command to LISTSERV@BITNIC
   or LISTSERV@BITNIC.EDUCOM.EDU in the BODY of e-mail:

      SUBSCRIBE BICYCLE real name

   For example: SUBSCRIBE BICYCLE John Doe

   Owner: Chris Tanski  CTANSKI@ONONDAGA.BITNET
                    or  captanski33@snycorva.cortland.edu


BikeMidwest

  A new regional internet discussion group has been started to discuss bicycle
  advocacy issues in the midwest area.  BikeMidwest was started to connect
  cyclists in L.A.W. Regions 6, 7, 8 and 9.  That is, the states of Ohio,
  Kentucky, Tennessee, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota,
  Iowa and Missouri.  Of course, people from outside this area are welcome
  to join.

  Subscriptions to the list are handled by a computer program called
  Majordomo.  To subscribe, send a message with the following command in the
  body of the message to Majordomo@fuji.physics.indiana.edu:

  subscribe BikeMidwest

===========================================================================
Rides
===========================================================================

Maps  (Jim Carson  carson@rice.edu)

BikeCentennial maps are not free, but you can get them without joining.
To order stuff with Mastercard or Visa, you can call 1-800-933-1116 (24
hr).  Maps are currently (May 1991) $6.95 each to "non-members," $4.95
each to "members." There are also small discounts for sets of maps and
members in the continental US don't have to pay for surface shipping and
handling.

Scale of the maps is generally 1" = 4mi/6.4km.  Certain areas are more
detailed when necessary.  I like the maps because they have lots of
interesting features labeled (campgrounds, grocery stores, major
changes in elevation, historical info about the region,...), they're
printed on a water-resistant paper, and they fit nicely into a handlebar
bag map case.

As of May '91, there are two and a half transcontinental (W-E) routes
an east coast (N-S) route, a west coast route (N-S), and numerous routes
among the various parks in the western U.S. and Canada.  [I say "2 1/2
transcontinental routes" because the southern portion of the transcontinental
route from TX to FL is not in print though the maps are "done."]

Membership is $22/annually, and they have a lifetime membership available.

Members get copies of BikeCentennial's magazine, _BikeReport_, published 9
times annually, a list of tours run by BikeCentennial, and the annual
_The Cyclists' Yellow Pages_.  _The Cyclists' Yellow Pages_ provides
*LOTS* of interesting information on touring and points of contact for
more information about cycling and touring all over the world.  (For
example, they have an arrangement with The Netherlands Service Center
for Tourism whereby you can purchase full-color, 21" x 38", 1:100k
scale, Dutch-language maps.)

BikeCentennial's address and phone:

        BikeCentennial
        (800) 933-1116, (406) 721-8719
        PO Box 8308
        Missoula, MT 59807-9988

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Touring supplies  (Scott "gaspo" Gasparian  gaspar@inf.ethz.ch)

        Recently, I asked the group: what do you bring with you on medium
trips? (medium being more than one nite, and less than a week).  I
received some excellent replies, a few great stories, and lots of things
that I never would have thought of. (at least not until I needed that
spare spoke that is).

Ok, for all of you who don't know what to bring with you on that
next medium trip...


FOOD:
        Here, just whatever you normally consume.  If you plan on
staying in a hotel/B&B, then obviously 1 day's worth is enough.
Standard things like power-bars and drink mixes should do the trick.
Since I'm not going to BFE, I have no idea what to pack for a real
"camp-out" type tour.  This subject is enough for a discussion in
itself, but I just eat what I want.

CLOTHING:
        Almost everybody suggested something different, rangin from hi-
tech bodysuits to cutoffs and T-shirts.  However, everybody agreed on the
indispensibleness (tm) of rain gear.  Specifically, light waterproof
pants and jacket are not only good for staying dry, but have a very high
warmth/weight ratio.
        A spare change of skivies, and a pair of dry socks were also
highly recomended.  A pair of jeans or a "smushable outfit" can come in
handy, but I usually smell so bad after a day of riding that anybody who is
talking to me doesn't care what I wear.  If it might be non-warm, a
watch-cap or other non-helmet type hat can help.

FIRST-AID:
        Outside of the standard band-aids/antiseptic-goop bit, sunscreen
and bug-away topped the lists.  Asprin or Ibuprofen and rolaids were
mentioned, but I guess thats a personal thing, just like...

TOILETRIES:
        I stick with: soap, toothbrush/paste, deodorant.  That covers
all I need, but everybody has different needs, and I'm not even gonna
touch the "personal hygeine" stuff.  A razor is handy too, it can help
keep that road-rash dressing from ripping all your remaining hair out.

MISC:
        I'll put the tent/pit stuff into this category.  Robyn Stewart
gave an excellent testamony to the uses of rope and tarps.  A piece of
rope stretched between two trees can keep the food above the
critter-level, and can also provide a rudimentary tent with the aid of
an old shower-curtain.  Again, there is a whole area of discussion here
on the pits and mattresses, but if it keeps you warm and dry, it works.


TOOLS:
        Basically, this could be split into two different classes, with
things like tire-kit being in the "fix it yourself" category, and other
stuff like a chain remover tool is in the  "how far will I be from
civilization" range.  This was what I really wanted to know about when I
posted my request, so a little more info than the first groups.

Most of this depends upon how much work _YOU_ do to your velo.  If
replacing spokes is trivial to you, then you already know what tools to
bring.  Also, wrenches and screwdrivers are very velo dependent: handy
sizes for a MTB might be useless for a nice racer, and vice-versa. Tools
that tune more than repair are also an individual call.  I always carry
a hex-wrench that fits my brake-shoe adjustment bolt, but never the larger
one that actually removes the entire caliper.

        pump
        pressure gauge
        flat kit
        wrenches (sizes and type for your velo)
        hex(allen)-wrenches (sizes and type for your velo)
        chain tool
        chain links
        tire levers (plastic)
        spoke wrench
        safety wire
        duct tape
        zip ties

SPARES:
        Again, these fall into "distance from civilization" categories.
For example, that nut that connects your front mudguard to the forks
is essential, but could be fixed with the safety wire until you find a
velo-shop/store that might have a replacement.  Then again, one little
nut is easy on space/weight, and it may be hard to get a replacement if
your velos measurements are non-standard.  If you have a hard-time
finding a replacement for that random part at your local store, bring
one with you.

        inner tubes
        tire-boots
        brake shoes
        light bulbs
        spokes (labeled if different, tied to the frame)
        nuts and bolts for rack/fenders/etc.
        tire (if you're _really_ out there)
        toe-clip strap
        shoe-laces
        cable (especially if yours are longer than normal).
        cable housing (for the shimano special shifter ones)

NIFTY IDEAS:
        Here are some of the better inside tips that I found both
humorous and usefull....

mjohnsto@shearson.com (Mike Johnston)
        A sock (to keep tools inside and for keeping grease off my hands
        during rear wheel flats)

s_kbca@dante.lbl.gov (Steve Kromer)
        he most important article to take along on a long ride
        seems to be faith.

chris@wg.estec.esa.nl (chris rouch)
        15cm of old tyre

Robyn Stewart <slais02@unixg.ubc.ca>
        Enough money to get Greyhound home if something goes terribly wrong.

sarahm@Cadence.COM
        bungie cords - you never know when you might want to get that
        set of six beer mugs as a souvenir and transport it on the
        back of your bike.

cathyf@is.rice.edu (Catherine Anne Foulston)
        ZAP Sport Towel.  I think it is really useful because you can
        get it wet and it still dries you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Taking a bike on Amtrak  (Carlos Martin  martin@morticia.Princeton.EDU)

The following article relates my own experience in taking a bike
as luggage on the Amtrak in the summer of 1992.  It is intended to
offer advice to those who might choose to do the same, and is not
intended to reflect the views or policies of Amtrak.  For reference,
I traveled from Trenton to Pittsburgh at the start of a tour.

Traveling with a bike on Amtrak can be problem-free if you take a few
precautions.  Amtrak handles bikes at stations that check in baggage.
(Smaller stations and some trains don't check baggage at all.)
There is a $5 baggage fee for bikes, and it includes a box.  Call
the station several days before your trip and notify them that you
will need a bicycle box.

The box they provided was big enough to accomodate my relatively
long-framed touring bike (Specialized Expedition) without taking off
either wheel, and with room to spare lengthwise.  You will, however,
have to remove the pedals (even clipless ones) and turn the handlebars
to fit the bike in the box.  Plan on putting only the bike in the box -
no helmet or panniers.  (You may want to check with Amtrak on this point -
they may not cover damages to the bike if you packed other stuff
in the box.)

Before leaving home for the station, loosen your pedals and stem
enough to make sure you won't need heavy-duty tools at the station.
Plan to arrive at the station one and a half hours before departure
time - Amtrak wants all checked baggage at least a half hour before
departure (they may tell you one hour).  Don't forget to keep your
tools handy.

At the station, go to the baggage room, get your box and some tape
from the attendant, remove the pedals, and loosen the stem bolt and
the bolt that holds the handlebars in the stem.  Hold the front
wheel between your feet as you turn the handlebars parallel to the
top tube.  Roll the bike into the box and seal the ends.
If everything goes smoothly, you can do the above packing in
ten minutes.  Now go have lunch before you get on the train
unless you want to take your chances with train food.

BTW, the trains are very roomy and comfortable, particularly if
you are accustomed to traveling in airline cattle coaches.
I would travel by Amtrak again in a similar situation.
(The usual disclaimer applies:  I have no connection to Amtrak,
other than being a taxpaying subsidizer and occasional user
of the rail system.)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Warm Showers List  (Terry Zmrhal  terryz@microsoft.com)

The Warm Showers List is a list of Internet Cyclists who have offered
their hospitality towards touring cyclists.  The extent of the
hospitality depends on the host and may range from simply a spot to
pitch a tent to meals, a warm (hot!) shower, and a bed.

If you wish to obtain the list, please email me at terryz@microsoft.com.
The actual Warm Showers list is not posted since it contains
personal information (addresses, phone numbers, etc.).

If you wish to be included on the Internet Warm Showers list, please
answer the questions below my signature in return mail to me. I have also
included in parenthesis a reason or two for the inclusion of each item
based on my experiences two summers ago.  Once I have received your
information, I will add it to the list and then you will receive the
complete list also.

Thanks to All
Terry Zmrhal
terryz@microsoft.com
'The Horizon is but a line to be crossed, not a limit to be reached.'

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Name:
(Who are you?)

Email Address:
(For pre-trip communication.)

Non-Email Contact (Address, Phone, and/or Work Phone):
(For communication once someone is traveling.)

Nearest largest city (>50,000 people) (and state):
(It's much easier to find a large city on a map than a small one, and
some small ones aren=92t even on some maps!)

Direction and Distance from above city:
(Some cities are very large and getting through or around a city can be
very difficult.)

Will provide-
Lawnspace (for tent or sleeping bag)?  Floorspace (for sleeping bag)?
Bed (Wow!)?
(Cyclists' gotta sleep.)

Food? (or distance to nearest grocery store or restaurant - if known)
(Cyclists' gotta eat.  You can provide as much, or as little, as you
want.)

Shower? (or distance to nearest motel - if known)
(It can be a real boost to know shower is waiting at the end of the
day?)

Availability:
(If only available some months, please indicate this, otherwise 'year-
round'.)

Cost to Cyclist, if any:
(Do you wish any money for your hospitality?  How much? (please, no more
than $5-$10))

Preferred Notice:
(Do you require advance notice?  If so, how many days (weeks) notice?)

Maximum Number of Cyclists:
(You don't want a major tour coming through :-)

Storage:
(Is there a safe place to store bikes?  If so, Storage for how many
bikes?)

Nearest Motel:
(Distance, Cost - if known)
(In case a host isn't home, for an emergency, etc.)

Nearest Bike Shop:
(Name, Phone, Distance, Reputation - if known)
(In case bike repairs are needed - good to know where good shops are.)

Any additional comments you would like each interested person to know
before contacting you?

===========================================================================
Racing
===========================================================================

Tour de France Jerseys  (Chris Murphy   murphyc@bionette.CGRB.ORST.EDU)

Chauner and Halstead (1990) in "The Tour de France Complete Book of Cycling"
explain:

YELLOW Jersey -- Overall leader, first awarded during the 1919 race (TdF
       started in 1903); yellow to match the paper used to print L'Auto
       (Automobile Cyclisme), a French newspaper about bike racing.

POLKADOT Jersey (White w/red dots) -- Best climber, determined by points
         scored by the first 3 to 15 riders finishing selected mountain
         stages (number of riders awarded points varies with the
         difficulty of the stage). First awarded 1933.

GREEN Jersey -- Points jersey, usually won by sprinter-types, with points
      given to the first 25 riders to finish each stage. First awarded 1953.

YELLOW Hats -- First place team, determined by combined elapsed times of the
       the team's top 3 riders.

In the event of a rider leading the race and also deserving one of the other
jerseys, the race leader wears yellow, and the 2nd place in the category wears
the category jersey.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Major Tour Winners 1947-1990  (Tim Smith tsmith@gryphon.CTS.COM)

[Ed note:  I'm hoping Tim won't be too upset if I add to the list he posted.
I need some help filling in the last few years.]

Winners of the Big Three National Tours -- Since 1947:

        Tour de France          Giro d'Italia           Vuelta d'Espana
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1947    Jean Robic (F)          Fausto Coppi (I)        E. van Dyck (B)
1948    Gino Bartali (I)        F. Magni (I)            B. Ruiz (E)
1949    Fausto Coppi (I)        F. Coppi                (not held)
1950    Ferdi Kubler (CH)       Hugo Koblet (CH)        E. Rodriguez (E)
1951    Hugo Koblet (CH)        F. Magni                (nh)
1952    Fausto Coppi            F. Coppi                (nh)
1953    Louison Bobet (F)       F. Coppi                (nh)
1954    Louison Bobet           C. Clerici (CH)         (nh)
1955    Louison Bobet           F. Magni                J. Dotto (F)
1956    Roger Walkowiak (F)     Charly Gaul (L)         A. Conterno (I)
1957    Jacques Anquetil (F)    Gastone Nencini (I)     J. Lorono (E)
1958    Charly Gaul (L)         E. Baldini (I)          Jean Stablinski (F)
1959    Federico Bahamontes (E) Charly Gaul             A. Suarez (E)
1960    Gastone Nencini (I)     Jacques Anquetil (F)    F. de Mulder (B)
1961    Jacques Anquetil        A. Pambianco (I)        A. Soler (E)
1962    Jacques Anquetil        F. Balmamion (I)        Rudy Altig (D)
1963    Jacques Anquetil        F. Balmamion            J. Anquetil (F)
1964    Jacques Anquetil        Jacques Anquetil        Raymond Poulidor (F)
1965    Felice Gimondi (I)      V. Adorni (I)           R. Wolfshohl (D)
1966    Lucien Aimar (F)        Gianni Motta (I)        F. Gabica (E)
1967    Roger Pingeon (F)       Felice Gimondi (I)      J. Janssen (NDL)
1968    Jan Janssen (NDL)       Eddy Merckx (B)         Felice Gimondi (I)
1969    Eddy Merckx (B)         Felice Gimondi          Roger Pingeon (F)
1970    Eddy Merckx             Eddy Merckx             Luis Ocana (E)
1971    Eddy Merckx             Gosta Petersson (S)     F. Bracke (B)
1972    Eddy Merckx             Eddy Merckx             J-M Fuente (E)
1973    Luis Ocana (E)          Eddy Merckx             Eddy Merckx (B)
1974    Eddy Merckx             Eddy Merckx             J-M Fuente
1975    Bernard Thevenet (F)    F. Bertoglio (I)        Tamames (E)
1976    Lucien van Impe (B)     Felice Gimondi          J. Pesarrodona (E)
1977    Bernard Thevenet        Michel Pollentier (B)   Freddy Maertens (B)
1978    Bernard Hinault (F)     J. de Muynck (B)        Bernard Hinault (F)
1979    Bernard Hinault         Giuseppe Saronni (I)    Joop Zoetemelk (NDL)
1980    Joop Zoetemelk (NDL)    Bernard Hinault (F)     F. Ruperez (E)
1981    Bernard Hinault         Giovanni Battaglin (I)  Giovanni Battaglin (I)
1982    Bernard Hinault         Bernard Hinault         Marino Lejarreta (E)
1983    Laurent Fignon (F)      Giuseppe Saronni (I)    Bernard Hinault (F)
1984    Laurent Fignon          Francesco Moser (I)     Eric Caritoux (F)
1985    Bernard Hinault         Bernard Hinault         Pedro Delgado (E)
1986    Greg Lemond (USA)       Roberto Visentini (I)   Alvaro Pino (E)
1987    Stephen Roche (EIR)     Stephen Roche (EIR)     Luis Herrera (Col.)
1988    Pedro Delgado (E)       Andy Hampsten (USA)     Sean Kelly (EIR)
1989    Greg Lemond (USA)       Laurent Fignon (F)      Pedro Delgado (E)
1990    Greg Lemond (USA)       Guanni Bugno (I)        Marco Giovanetti (I)
1991    Miguel Indurain (E)     Franco Chioccioli (I)   Melchior Mauri (E)
1992    Miguel Indurain (E)     Miguel Indurain (E)     Toni Rominger (CH)
1993                            Miguel Indirain (E)     Toni Rominger (CH)

The Tour started in 1903, and was not held 1915-1918 and 1940-1946.
The Giro started in 1909, and was not held 1915-1918 and 1941-1945.

Source: 1947-1982: "La Fabuleuse Histoire du Cyclisme" by Pierre Chany.
        1982-1988: my fallible memory. Would someone complete 1983 and
        1984, and correct any mistakes? Thanks.

One interesting observation: almost all the winners of the Tour were
big names in their time (yes, eve CharlyGaul and Jean Robc.)

There were no same-year winners of the Tour and the Giro before 1949.
In fact, the first year  non-Italian won the Giro was 1950.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rating the Tour de France Climbs  (Bruce Hildenbrand  bhilden@bigriver.Eng.Sun.COM)

One of the most frequently asked questions is how do the organizers
determine the ratings for the climbs in the Tour de France(TIOOYK).
The Tour organizers use two criteria 1) the length and steepness of
the climb and 2) the position of the climb in the stage.

It is important to note several things before this discussion begins.
First, the organizers of the Tour have been very erratic in their
classifications of climbs.  The north side of the Col de la Madeleine
has flip-flopped between a Category 1 to an Hors Category climb,
even though it seems to be in the same position of a stage every
year.

Secondly, rating inflation, so rampant in other sports has raised
its ugly head here.  Climbs that used to be Category 2 are now
Category 1, even though, like the Madeleine, they occupy the same
position in a stage year after year.

Let's talk about the ratings.  I will give you my impressions
on what I think the criteria are for rating the climbs based on
having ridden over 75 of the rated climbs in the major European
tours.

Note that gradual climbs do not receive grades.  It has been my
observation that about a 4% grade is necessary for a climb to get
rated.  Also, a climb must gain at least 100m for it to be rated.

Category 4 - the lowest category, climbs of 300-1000 feet(100-300m).

Category 3 - climbs of 1000-2000 feet(300-600m).

Category 2 - climbs of 2000-3500 ft.(600-1100m)

Category 1 - climbs of 3500-5000ft(1100-1500m)

Hors Category - the hardest, climbs of 5000ft+(1500m+)

Steepness also plays a factor in the rating.  Most of the big climbs
in the Alps average 7-8% where the big climbs in the Pyrenees average
8-9%.

Please remember that I am giving very, very rough guidelines and
that there are exceptions to every rule.  For example, L'Alpe D'Huez
climbs 3700ft(1200m), but is an Hors Category climb.  This is because
it usually comes at the end of a very tough stage and the climb itself
is unusually steep(~9%) by Alpine standards.

More confusing is the Col de Borderes, a mere 1000ft(300m) climb outside
of Arrens in the Pyrenees mountains.  I have seen it rated anywhere from
a Category 3 to a Category 1!!!  This is most likely due again, to its
placement on the stage.  The Category 3  rating came when it was near
the beginning of a stage where its Category 1 rating came when it was
near the end.

Flat or downhill sections can also affect a climb's rating.  Such
sections offer a rest to the weary and can reduce the difficulty
of the climb considerably.  This may be one of the reasons that
the aforementioned Col de la Madeleine, which has a 1 mile downhill/
flat section at mid-height, flip-flops in its rating.

I am often asked how climbs in the United States compare to those in
Europe.  Most of the US climbs are either short, but steep enough by
European standards(6-8% grade) to fall into the Category 3 or possibly 2,
or the climbs gain enough altitude, but are too long(they average <5%)
so again they would fail to break the Category 1 barrier and end up
most likely a Category 2 or 3.

Fear not, there are exceptions.  Most notable to Californains is
the south side of Palomar Mountain which from Poma Valley climbs
4200' in 11 miles, a true category 1 ascent.

A popular Northern California climb, Mount Hamilton, is similar to
Palomar Mountain but, fails to be a Category 1 climb because of
two offending downhill section on the ascent.

For Coloradoans, you can thank the ski industry for creating long,
but relatively gradual climbs that rarely exceed 5% for any substantial
length(5+ miles).  I never had to use anything bigger than a 42x23
on any climb in Colorado, regardless of altitude.  Gear ratios of
39x24 or 26 are commonplace in the Alps and Pyrenees and give a very
telling indication as to the difficulty of European climbs.

One potential category 1 climb for Coloradoans may be the 4000 ft.
climb in about 15 miles from Ouray to the top of Red Mountain Pass.

Also, remember we are rating only paved(i.e. asphalt) roads.  Dirt roads
vary considerably in their layout, condition and maintenance because there
really are no guidelines for their construction.  This makes it difficult
to compare these climbs and inappropriate to lump them with paved roads.

One last note.  I think it is inappropriate to compare the ascents of
climbs by the European pros with the efforts of us mere mortals.
I have said this time and time again and I will repeat it now.  It
is very, very hard for the average person to comprehend just how
fast the pros climb the big passes.  Pace makes all the difference.
Riding a climb is very different than racing it.

Bruce

===========================================================================
Social
===========================================================================

Bicycling in America  (Jobst Brandt  jobst_brandt@hplabs.hp.com)

(or How to survive on a bicycle)

In America, bicycling appears to be an unacceptable activity for
adults.  It is viewed as a pastime reserved for children (people who
are not old enough to drive cars).  Adults who sense that they are
violating this stricture, excuse their bicycling by representing it as
the pursuit of physical fitness.  They refer to their bicycling as
training rides.  Rarely do you hear a cyclist say "we were bicycling"
but rather "we were on a training ride".  Certainly most of these
people never race although one might assume, by implication, that
their other rides are races.  Some also refer to themselves as serious
cyclists, a term used to describe those who, typically, keep track of
pedaling cadence and other bicycling statistics, thereby giving proof
that they are not engaged in child's play.

In contrast, Europeans seem able to accept bicycling as a proper
activity for all ages.  That is to say, motorists do not treat
bicyclists with apartheid and bicyclists do not feel the need to
justify their pursuit as anything other than bicycling, for whatever
reason.  In Europe cadence on speedometers is an un-marketable
function for unexplained reasons, however, one could imagine that for
the average cyclist it is a useless statistic, except for those on
"training rides".

With this perception of bicycling in America, non cyclists and some
occasional cyclists are offended by others who bicycle on public roads
in the presence of automobile traffic.  "Get the f#%k off the road!"
and similar epithets are heard from drivers, some of whose cars are
equipped with bike racks.  It is similar to gay bashing; by expressing
public outrage they demonstrate abhorrence of unacceptable behavior.
The same is true of bicyclists who deride others in public for not
wearing a helmet.  Aggressive self righteousness is probably a fitting
description.

Another motive behind such behavior may be a sense of dissatisfaction
with ones life.  Anyone who is perceived as having fun, or at least
more fun than the subject, needs to be brought down a notch.
Psychologists who have interviewed youths that go "wilding" have
gotten responses to the effect that "my life is terrible and I can't
stand people who are having fun".  So these youths attack others and
beat them bloody.  In a manner that may not make sense to others, they
bring their victims down a notch to achieve parity.

There is little doubt that bicycling has its hazards.  You can fall by
running into a pothole or an obstacle, by riding into a grating, or
falling on loose gravel or a slick manhole cover.  There are enough
hazards without the threat of being run down by a car.  However, the
whole sport loses its appeal when motorists, who believe that adult
bicycling is offensive, actively engage in making it a deadly
endeavor.

The scenario:

In a typical encounter a driver says to his passenger "You see that
guy on the bicycle?  That's a dangerous place to ride." while slicing
within inches of the cyclist.  The passenger is truly impressed with
the danger of bicycling, especially in the presence of this driver.

I don't understand how drivers justify such behavior but I think I
know what is going on.

Examples:

o  The buzz and swerve routine:

A driver slices dangerously close even though there is no opposing
traffic.  Then he drifts to the edge of the pavement to make clear how
far he went out of his way for the cyclist.  The desired path was even
nearer the road shoulder than at the passing point.  The buzz and
swerve is executed equally well consciously and subconsciously.

o  Center court, extra point:

The car, on a visibly empty stretch of road, travels perfectly
centered between the median and edge stripes, even when this requires
passing within inches of a cyclist.  It appears that the driver is
awarding himself points for not flinching when passing cyclists and
extra points for proximity.  In the event of a collision it is, of
course, the cyclist who swerved unexpectedly.  The precision with
which the driver executes this maneuver, in spite of the danger, makes
the center court game conspicuous.  People generally don't drive
exactly centered in a lane, especially when there is an obstacle.

o  Honk and slice:

The buzz and swerve or center court routine can be enhanced by honking
a single one second blast.  This is usually done at a far greater
distance than a sincere warning toot; about 200 yards works best.
This is a great crutch for the driver who subsequently collides with
the cyclist.  "But I warned him!"

o  The trajectory intercept:

A car is traveling on a road that crosses the cyclists path at right
angles.  The car and bike are equally distant from the intersection
but at different speeds.  With skill, the driver of the car can slow
down at a rate that lets him arrive at the intersection at precisely
the same time as the cyclist.  The bicyclist who has a stop sign may
now come to a complete stop and wait for the driver who is only
looking out for the cyclist's safety.  If the cyclist doesn't stop,
the driver honks and yells something about breaking the law.

Extra points are gained by offering the right of way to the cyclist,
in spite of moving traffic in the adjacent lanes.

o  The contrived hindrance:

A driver refuses to pass a cyclist on a two lane road until the
passenger asks how much longer they must follow this bicyclist, or
until the following cars begin to honk.  Then, regardless of
visibility or oncoming traffic, an inopportune pass is executed after
which each of following drivers makes it clear when passing that it
was the cyclist who was responsible for the near collision.

o The rear-ender:

While riding down a mountain road, the cyclist catches up with a car
that notices his rapid approach.  If an oncoming car approaches the
driver slows down, obviously for safety sake, and then suddenly slams
on the brakes when there is no place for the cyclist to go.  Bicycles
cannot stop as fast as cars since cars can safely skid the front
wheels but bicycles can't.  This game is the more dangerous variation
of speeding up every time the cyclist tries to pass but to drive as
slowly as possible everywhere else.

One explanation for these maneuvers is that the driver recalls that
riding in the mountains was always too hard and riding down hill was
scary.  This cyclist can't do what I couldn't do and I'll show him a
thing or two.  Thus the driver proves to himself that not riding in
the hills was for safety's sake, it had nothing to do with physical
ability.  It fits into the " I'll teach that smartass a lesson.  There
is little risk for the car because in a rear-end collision the vehicle
behind is, with few exceptions, found at fault.

So why does all this go on and on?

It is not as though they are all hostile drivers; some are just
frustrated drivers.  They may still be getting even for some bicycle
accident they had in their youth and don't want others to get off any
easier.  Some are angry at having to spend the time behind the wheel
while other "irresponsible adults" are playing on their bicycles.  I
believe the meanest ones are insecure people who don't feel as though
they are accomplishing what they expect of themselves and don't like
to see others have it any better.  Many drivers believe that the only
part of the road to which a bicyclist is entitled is the road
shoulder, unless it occurs to the driver to use that part too.

A bike rack on a car may lead you to believe that the driver has a pro
bicycle attitude.  Some people use bike racks to transport family
bicycles to a park where they can be ridden safely without venturing
onto dangerous roads; roads that are meant for cars.  Among these
people are some of the strongest opponents of general bicycling.  They
take refuge in the belief that, if they should run you down while
playing center court, it would prove that you should bicycle as they
do, and not get in the way of cars.

What to do?  Don't fuel the flames.  Don't return the rudeness that is
dished out.  Take legal action where appropriate (and possible).
Don't posture in traffic drawing attention to some undefined
supriority to people ho sitin car.  Don't balance on your bike or
ride in circles in front of cars waiting at a red light.  Don't make
moves in traffic that are either discourteous, or at best, awkward but
legal.  If you hear loud knobby tires coming, believe it!  That guy in
the extra tall pickup truck with the all terrain tires, dual roll bars
and multiple searchlights is not a friend of yours coming close to say
hello.  Give him room.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

League of American Bicyclists  (Erin O'Brien  bikeleague@aol.com)

The League of American Bicyclists, (founded as the League of American
Wheelmen) has been working to improve the quality of bicycling in America
almost as long as there have been bicycles.

In the 1870s the forefathers of bicycling banded together to lobby the
government for more paved roads and to put a stop to antagonistic acts from
other road-users.  United in 1880 as the League of American Bicyclists, their
mission has carried on throughout the history of bicycling.

Fashioned after "The Good Roads Movement" of the 1880's, our current agenda
is embodied by the L.A.W. Safe Roads Movement, a comprehensive program that
aims to reduce the number of injuries and deaths to cyclists.  Highlights
of this 10-pointaction plan include educating bicyclists and other road
users about thei rights and responsibilities to safely share the road, and
promoting the improvement of road design and maintenance to better
accommodate bicycles.

The League's Effective Cycling program is making great strides to advance
this agenda.  Taught by certified instructors, it is the only national
bicycling education program that combines the technical training needed to
safely negotiate any traffic situation, with the principles of safe,
responsible riding.

L.A.W. sponsors National Bike Month (May), which serves to promote the
various aspects of bicycling.  In 1992, L.A.W. founded The International
Police Mountain Bike Association (IPMBA) to address the growing need for
information, assistance, and training to start-up bicycle-mounted police
patrols.

L.A.W. played an instrumental role in the passage of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Equity Act of 1991 (ISTEA), federal legislation allowing
both for increased spending on bicycling improvements and for bicyclists to
participate in local transportation planning.  L.A.W. also publishes the
bi-monthly Bicyclist Advocacy Bulletin, which provides the most
comprehensive, bicycle advocacy and planning information and advice
available in the nation.

In between advocacy and education efforts, L.A.W. manages to find time to
enjoy bicycling.  L.A.W.'s national and regional rallies bring together
members from all over the U.S.A. and Canada for great riding and
entertainment, daily workshops include, advocacy, safety, club leadership,
cycling techniques, and more.

Pedal for Power, another division of L.A.W., hosts Across America and
North-Southa rides that raise money for bicycling and various charities of
the rider's choice.

Eight issues per year of Bicycle USA magazine to keep members up to date on
League activities.  Regular features include effective cycling tips,
Government Relations and Education columns, cycle news, and an event
calendar.  Special issues include an annual Almanac and Tourfinder.  L.A.W.
offers national touring services to members including Ride Information
Contacts in every state.  While touring, members can also stay in the homes
of more than 600 fellow members, free of charge, through the Hospitality
Homes network.

League members can fly their bikes for free on TWA, America West, USAir,
Continental, and Northwest airlines when they make their travel
arrangements through the Sports National Reservation Center.

L.A.W. is a 501c-3 non-profit organization with membership of more than
24,000 bicyclists and 500 affiliated clubs and coalitions nationwide.
Individual membership costs $25/year or $30 for families.  Advocacy
membership, which includes the bi-monthly Bicyclist Advocacy Bulletin costs
an additional $10/year.

To join the League of American Bicyclists send your membership contribution
to 190 W. Ostend St., Suite 120, Baltimore, MD 21230-3755, or call (410)
539-3399.  For membership by phone call 1-800-288-BIKE.  For a membership
form to pay by credit card see the "How to Join League" file.

===========================================================================
Marketplace
===========================================================================

Marketplace hints/guidelines  (Jim Siler  ksi@panix.com)

: Are people really willing to pay 10% less for a "nearly new" MTB when
: they
:        a) often have no assurance that it really hasn't been used
:           (except of course someone's word)

:        b) may have to buy, unseen.

:        c) may not get a transferable waranty on the MTB

I think that in general, many people are acutely aware of what they
spent for a thing and are woefully unaware of how much value that thing
lost when they walked out of the store.  Let's assume for a moment
that I buy an XTR rear derailleur in my local shop (good practice,
worth some added cost) for $100.  I use it for a week, and trash my
frame and want to part it out.  Hmmm... this was $100 new and its only
a week old, virtually new.  Let's ask $90 o.b.o. and see what happens.

Now I change roles and become the buyer.

I go to my local bike shop, where I trust the owner and am willing
to pay a premium, but no XTR rear derailleur.  Next stop mail order.
Everyone but everyone has it for $80, plus shipping, but less tax.
They will take a credit card.  The unit is warrantied, in the box,
with instructions (the value of which should not be underesimated).

Given this I am unlikeley to even consider the used part.  But let's
suppose I offer $75, and send off my money order, sight unseen.
What can happen?

1 --    It never arrives.  After a number of hassles and excuses I
        realize that there is a major problem.  Email stops being
        returned.  I contact his sysadm, who can't do much.  I
        publicly flame him, starting one more interminable flame
        war.  Eventually I either get my $75 bucks back or not.
        Even if I get the derailleur (remeber, the original
        object was the derailleur) I have bought myself
        hundreds of dollars worth of aggravation.

2 --    It arrives and looks like hell.  C'est la vie.

3 --    I arrives and one week later it is obvious that something
        is seriously wrong.  No amount of adjustment will cause
        it to shift reliably for any length of time.  See 2, above.

4 --    While waiting for arrival i trash MY frame.  Derailleur
        arrives.  Sadly, I have nothing to hang it on.  See 2,
        above.

Let's run through the same scenarios having purchased through mail
order, using a credit card.

1 --    I don't pay.  If they get pissy about it I do too.  As most
        mail order houses have, at best,  a fragile relationship
        with Mastecard/Visa (it is VERY difficult to open a merchant
        account to accept credit cards over the phone for mail order,
        so difficult that many use their in store accounts, faking
        signatures) and are dependent on that relationship to stay
        in business, they tend to become most reasonable when you
        make real noise with the credit card company.

2 --    Unlikely, as goods should be new.  See 1, above.

3 --    Warranty problem.  If you have a good local dealer, you
        would have been better off there.  If you have a so-so
        dealer you may well be better off through mail order.
        Worse comes to worst, see 1, above.

4 --    Worst case, you eat a restocking fee.

In general, I would be hesitant to buy anything here for much more
than 60% of its mail order price, unless the product is exactly
what I want and all else is right.

I have bought two things this year through this group, a GT Zaskar LE
frame, new in the box with slight cosmetic ding for $350 (negotiated
from $375) and a Flashlite 2 tent with a tiny hole, professionally
repaired, for $100.  Both carried resonable prices in the original
post, offered to pay the shipping, and clearly spelled out the
possible problems with the product for sale.  Both sales were
satisfactory to all involved, and I am delighted with both.

I have seen many other Items for sale that I have wanted and bought
elsewhere because the posted prices were so ridiculous that I
had no basis for negotiation.  Typically, these are reposted with
sad wonderings as to why no one has responded.  C'est la vie.

In general, I think that anyone wanting to move something quickly
through posting should do the following:

        Be realistic with price.  Look at the true market value of
        your goods.  It is not what you paid.  You are going to take
        a loss.  If your fork, which was the hottest thing in July
        of this year, cost you $600 in a store is not any better
        than the new $375 fork that is available in December, its
        market value is certainly no more than $375, if it is new.
        Unless limited availability takes it out of the commodity
        realm (e.g., my Zaskar frame with blemish had only limited
        availibility) knock off 40% of the realistic market value.
        Our fork is now down to $225.  If this makes you too
        queasy, up it a bit and throw in shipping, say $275 with
        U.P.S. ground shipping, hmmm... not too bad.

        Clearly state everything of importance to the buyer, good
        and bad.  This will avoid later hassles, and greatly increase
        your trust factor.

        Don't initially offer at an inflated price, thinking to
        negotiate down (remember back to Onza Clipless Pedals for
        sale flame war).  It just makes it clear to an intellegent
        buyer that you are hoping to find a sucker, and will take
        whatever advantage you can.  This may not be true, but it
        will be clear, nonetheless.  Trust factor goes down the
        toilet.

        Make phone contact as soon as possible.  A human voice is
        often more comforting than an email address.

To anyoune who has read this far, thanks for putting up with my
rambling and opining.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bike Trailers

[Ed note:  The posting I saved on bike trailers is over 145k bytes, so
if you want a copy see the section on "Archives".]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

One Less Car T-Shirts  (Alayne McGregor  alayne@gandalf.UUCP)
                       (Ed Ravin  panix!eravin@cmcl2.nyu.edu)

The T-shirts are produced by Transportation Alternatives, a New York
City bicycle activist group. They're 100% cotton, have the TA logo
on the front, and ONE LESS CAR on the back.  Call TA for colors and
sizes currently in stock.  They're US$15 each.  No refunds or
exchanges.  Allow 6 weeks for delivery.  For people who have to
drive but feel guilty about it, they also have "I'm Polluting the
Atmosphere" bumper stickers at 3 for $5.

Send orders to:

Transportation Alternatives
92 Saint Marks Place
New York, NY 10009
USA
attn: One Less Car

I happen to have one of these shirts in my closet right now. Causes lots
of comments when my covivant and I ride our tandem with both us wearing
our shirts.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Panniers and Racks  (Sharon Pedersen  pedersen@cartan.berkeley.edu)

This is a condensed version of a longer article on panniers, low-rider
racks, loading and generators.  --Sharon   pedersen@cartan.berkeley.edu

                             --PANNIERS--
Price--cheaper may not be better, if they fall apart.  Commuting to
school entails stuffing sharp-cornered books into them thus making
sturdiness as important here as for touring.

Cut--an angled cut may make those books not fit so well.

Pockets--convenient for organization, but cuts down on versatile use
of space.  You can use stuff sacks for organization instead of pockets.
One big and one small pocket on each pannier is plenty.

Fastening--lots of options:  bungees and hooks, or fixed placement
hooks, or straps with buckles or cams.  Bungees and hooks have been
just fine in my own road experience, but for off-road riding, you will
want more security.  However, don't get a system with so many
attachments that you can't stand to take the panniers on/off.

Brands--the following is a by no means exhaustive list, with
telegraphic comments made in 1988.  Check local stores since features
may have changed since then.
  Eclipse--(no comment);  Kirtland--tourers like them;
  MPacks--panniers made by an actual bike tourer, Mike Center, in
    Santa Rosa, CA, (707) 545-4624;
  Maddens--made in Boulder, "superior construction at better than
    average cost" yeah!  (I love mine, write for more glowing testimonials);
  Performance--low-cost, non-spring attachment;  Rhode Gear--expensive;
  Tailwind--aerodynamic, rigid attachment.

                         --LOW-RIDER RACKS--
  Some manufacturers: Bruce Gordon, Blackburn, Vetta, Voyager.  The
Bruce Gordons are more expensive (~$70 in 1988) but are designed with
clearance for the quick-release skewer so you don't have to pry them
apart to take the front wheel off.

                            --REAR RACKS--
  (No comment in the original article;  Blackburns seem to be the
standard and durable enough.)

                             --LOADING--
  Balance the load side-to-side and, if possible, fore-and-aft.
Keep heavier items low and towards the bottom bracket.  Rider, bike
and luggage together should have 55-60% of weight on rear wheel;
remainder on front.  Bike with front low-riders is quite stable.

                            --GENERATORS--
  The usual location on the left seat-stay interferes with panniers.
Mount the generator on the right seat-stay facing the other way, and
it will work fine, despite rotating "backwards."  Or go with a
generator under the bottom bracket, which will have the advantage of
putting the wear on the tread rather than the sidewall of the tire.



Make REAL money with your website!

The entire AOH site is optimized to look best in Firefox® 2.0 on a widescreen monitor (1440x900 or better).
Site design & layout copyright © 1986-2008 AOH
We do not send spam. If you have received spam bearing an artofhacking.com email address, please forward it with full headers to abuse@artofhacking.com.