AOH :: ISN-1140.HTM

Fear, Anger, Distrust




Fear, Anger, Distrust
Fear, Anger, Distrust



http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,103060,00.html 

Opinion by Frank Hayes 
JULY 11, 2005 
COMPUTERWORLD

Can your users change when it comes to security? Yes, probably. At
least that's what two surveys that came out last week suggest. The Pew
Internet & American Life Project polled 1,300 Internet users about
spyware and related problems (the results are online at
Pewinternet.org). Meanwhile, Computerworld.com columnist Larry Ponemon
reported on a Ponemon Institute survey of 400 people who were victims
of a personal data breach [QuickLink 55301] [1].

Neither study is intended to be about changing what users do. But the
lessons they offer in that line are pretty compelling.

Unfortunately, you may not much like those lessons.

See, the main thing that's clear from both studies is that fear, anger
and distrust are what motivate users to change. In the Pew survey, 91%
of users said fears about malware have made them change how they deal
with e-mail, the Web, downloads and even software user agreements.  
And, according to the Ponemon survey, most of those whose personal
information is leaked will dump the bank, credit card or other company
that exposed their data.

So users will change -- if they get afraid, angry or distrustful. That
might be useful in getting them to stop doing risky, insecure things.  
But only if you make sure they're not afraid, angry or distrustful in
your direction.

So threatening them with punishment for breaking security rules won't
work. Neither will trying to force them to obey or lying to them. No
wonder IT's standard techniques for getting users to behave always
fail. They're exactly the wrong approach.

Then what might work? Beyond fear, anger and distrust, there are some
other useful insights to be gleaned from these studies:

* Users like the personal touch. According to the Ponemon survey, 
  users who got a phone call after their personal data was exposed 
  were much more likely to trust the company than were users who just got a 
  written notice. Lesson for IT: Memos don't work. Personal contact is 
  expensive, and lots of IT people could use some polish on their 
  people skills. But if you want to change behavior, you'll need to do 
  it one on one. 

* Users drag their feet, but they want a quick response from others. 
  The Pew survey says two-thirds of users will wait a week or more 
  before dealing with a suspected spyware infection, and 20% will 
  never deal with it. But the Ponemon results say users resent any 
  delay in being informed of a security breach. Lesson: You need to 
  respond fast, then convey that urgency to users so they'll call you 
  as soon as they suspect a problem instead of letting it fester. 

* Users pass the buck. Pew says users often blame friends or family 
  for spyware infections. ("Nope, it's not my fault.") Lesson: Never 
  mind the blame for past problems. Focus on things that "we" -- 
  meaning users and IT staffers -- can do to avoid this problem going 
  forward. 

* Users do better with follow-ups. In fact, Ponemon says that 82% of 
  users expected more help than they got after their data was exposed. 
  Lesson: Don't do just enough. Don't tell them just once. Remind 
  them. Repeat the message. Then check back to reinforce it with a 
  positive spin. ("Everything working OK? Still keeping an eye out for 
  those bad e-mail attachments?") 

* Finally, users want more information. Really. Ponemon says 67% of 
  users thought the information they got after a security breach was 
  incomplete or unreliable. Pew says 60% of users who have spywarelike 
  problems can't figure out what's wrong. Lesson: Give users that 
  information. Make it straight, clear and useful. Ask for questions. 
  Make sure users understand your answers. You want them to clearly 
  grasp security threats and the damage they can do. 

After all, now that you know the strongest motivators of change for
users, you want their fear, anger and distrust aimed squarely at
security threats -- where they belong.

-=-

Frank Hayes, Computerworld's senior news columnist, has covered IT for
more than 20 years. Contact him at frank_hayes at computerworld.com.

[1] http://www.computerworld.com/q?55301 



_________________________________________
Attend the Black Hat Briefings and
Training, Las Vegas July 23-28 - 
2,000+ international security experts, 
10 tracks, no vendor pitches.
www.blackhat.com 

Site design & layout copyright © 1986-2014 CodeGods