|
|
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2007/01/21/2006_vulns_tally/
By Robert Lemos
SecurityFocus
21 Jan 2007
Flaws in Web applications boosted the bug counts for 2006 by more than a
third over the previous year, according to data obtained by
SecurityFocus from the four major vulnerability databases.
On Monday, the Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) Coordination
Center released its final tally of the number of flaws the organization
processed in 2006. Counting both public sources and private submissions
directly to the CERT Coordination Center, the group logged 8,064
vulnerabilities last year, an increase of 35 per cent over the number of
flaws reported in 2005.
The three other major flaw databases - the National Vulnerability
Database, the Open-Source Vulnerability Database, and the Symantec
Vulnerability Database - recorded jumps anywhere from 20 to 35 per cent
in 2006 compared to 2005.
The greatest factor in the skyrocketing number of vulnerabilities is
that certain types of flaws in community and commercial Web applications
have become much easier to find, said Art Manion, vulnerability team
lead for the CERT Coordination Center.
"The best we can figure, most of the growth is due to fairly
easy-to-discover vulnerabilities in Web applications," Manion said.
"They are easy to find, easy to create, and easy to deploy."
The burgeoning flaw counts for 2006 should come as no surprise to most
security researchers. A jump in the number of vulnerabilities recorded
by the same four databases in 2005 had also been blamed on easy-to-find
bugs in web applications. In the first half of 2006, more than three
quarters of all software flaws affected online applications, according
to security firm Symantec, the owner of SecurityFocus. And a report
released in October by the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
Project found that the top-three categories of flaws were specific to
Web programs and accounted for 45 per cent of the bugs reported in the
first nine months of the year.
Simply searching through source code or using Google code search can
turn up a large number of potential security issues, allowing even
novice flaw finders to pinpoint possible security holes. The maintainers
of the flaw databases have been inundated with submissions found by
would-be vulnerability researchers who use simple string-matching
programs find potential issues in open-source applications, said Steven
Christey, the editor of the CVE Project maintained by The MITRE Corp., a
non-profit government contractor.
"Many people are doing 'grep and gripe' research," Christey said,
referring to the flexible search program grep commonly part of Unix-like
systems. "They are doing a regular expression search, looking for
patterns. If they get a match they will report it to the public, but
sometimes what ends up happening is they are reporting false positives."
While novices are focusing on Web applications, other researchers have
started focusing on other parts of the operating system as well as
popular applications. Tools, known as fuzzers, have become an
increasingly popular way to check software for problems caused by the
input data given to the program. Such tools have been so successful in
finding flaws that some researchers have resorted to the controversial
tactic of releasing a bug every day for an entire month to garner
attention to the issues.
"You have an emerging levels of sophistication for vulnerability
researchers," Christey said. "You have a lot of people who are able to
find the low-hanging fruit. But for major software, it seems to be
getting more difficult for top researchers to find these issues - they
have to work harder, spend more time, spend more resources, (and) do
more complex research."
Web flaws boost bug counts
Easy-to-find vulnerabilities in Web applications significantly boosted
the number of flaws found in 2006, exceeding the previous year by
anywhere from 20 percent to 50 per cent.
2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
CERT/CC 8,064 5,990 3,780 3,784 4,129 2,437
NVD 6,604 4,877 2,367 1,281 1,959 1,672
OSVDB 8,500+* 7,187 4,629 2,632 2,184 1,656
Symantec 4,883 3,766 2,691 2,676 2,604 1,472
* OSVDB has estimated from data processed so far that there will be at
least 20 per cent more vulnerabilities logged in 2006 compared to
2005.
Sources: Computer Emergency Response Team Coordination Center (CERT/CC),
National Vulnerability Database, Open-Source Vulnerability Database, and
the Symantec Vulnerability Database.
The surge in vulnerabilities in 2006 does not necessarily mean that the
Internet is a less safe place for computer users.
Many of the Web applications in which flaws were found are community
projects not typically used by major companies, said Brian Martin,
content manager for the Open-Source Vulnerability Database.
"For the personal sites and the mom-and-pop stores that rely on the
software, it certainly affects them," Martin said. "But larger companies
likely aren't affected."
Applications written in the popular dynamic Web programming language,
PHP, appeared to account for 43 percent of the total vulnerabilities
reported in 2006. The language is typically used in community-created
software and smaller Web sites, but a number of notable Internet giants,
such as Yahoo! and Google, also use PHP.
While Web applications may account for the boost in vulnerability
numbers, the smaller number of flaws found in operating systems and
client-side applications typically pack a bigger punch.
"From a core operating system standpoint, we are more secure, but the
reality is that malicious code has not gone away," said Oliver
Friedrichs, director of security response for Symantec. "Malware is
still getting on your system, it is just not using core operating system
vulnerabilities to do it."
And, while they make up a small fraction of the overall number of
vulnerabilities, previously unknown - or zero-day -flaws targeted by
active attacks became a big trend in 2006, Friedrichs pointed out.
"The real threat with a zero-day is they are frequently used in a very
targeted fashion against companies and enterprises to steal information,
where a simple web vulnerability on the Internet does not have as much
of a material impact," he said.
This article originally appeared in Security Focus.
Copyright 2007, SecurityFocus
_____________________________
Subscribe to InfoSec News
http://www.infosecnews.org/mailman/listinfo/isn