AOH :: ISNQ5427.HTM

Advanced tactic targeted grocer




Advanced tactic targeted grocer
Advanced tactic targeted grocer



http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/03/28/advanced_tactic_targeted_grocer/ 

By Ross Kerber
Globe Staff
The Boston Globe
March 28, 2008

A massive data breach at Hannaford Brothers Cos. was caused by a "new 
and sophisticated" method in which software was secretly installed on 
servers at every one of its grocery stores, the company told 
Massachusetts regulators this week. more stories like this

The unauthorized intrusion the company disclosed on March 17 stemmed 
from software that intercepted card data from customers as they paid 
with plastic at store checkout counters, and sent the data overseas, 
Hannaford's top lawyer said in a letter sent to Attorney General Martha 
Coakley and Governor Deval Patrick's Office of Consumer Affairs and 
Business Regulation.

The software was installed on computer servers at each of the roughly 
300 stores operated by Hannaford and its partners. Hannaford did not say 
how the software might have been placed on so many servers, and company 
spokeswoman Carol Eleazer said the company continues to investigate how 
the software was installed and other specifics of the breach. The Secret 
Service, which pursues currency crimes, is conducting its own 
investigation.

Data security specialists say the new details show how hackers have 
grown more adept at penetrating weak links in the systems that connect 
merchants and banks. In previous breaches, such as the record-setting 
intrusion at TJX Cos. of Framingham, where as many as 100 million card 
numbers were compromised, hackers took advantage of merchants who stored 
customer names and card data - sometimes in violation of payment 
industry standards - at central locations in their computer networks.

In contrast, Hannaford says it did not store customer information. The 
hackers who struck Hannaford mined a stream of data that the merchant 
and banks were not responsible for protecting under industry rules, 
industry specialists said.

The Hannaford breach "was markedly more sophisticated," said Steve 
Rowen, a partner at Retail Systems Research of Miami, which does 
consulting work for merchants.

The Hannaford breach also poses worrisome questions for the payment 
industry as it struggles to tighten security. Hannaford, for example, 
had met compliance standards set by Visa Inc. and other card companies, 
but that did not stop the breach.

"Just because they are compliant, it doesn't mean they are safe," said 
Graham Cluley, technology consultant for Sophos Inc., a Burlington 
computer security firm. Card issuers and others need to find other ways 
to improve security, he added.

"Clearly, consumer confidence is being shaken by this constant stream of 
breaches," Cluley said.

Hannaford said in the letter that the problem potentially compromised 
the account numbers and expiration dates on all 4.2 million credit and 
debit card numbers used at its stores in six states between Dec. 7 and 
March 10, though the actual number taken may be smaller. Hannaford said 
it knows of about 2,000 cases of fraud related to the intrusion.

Hannaford's letter was sent by its general counsel, Emily D. Dickinson. 
more stories like this

Dickinson wrote that an "illicit and unauthorized computer program" 
known as "malware" was installed on the servers of each of the stores 
the company operates in Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, 
and New York, plus at stores elsewhere, including the Sweetbay chain in 
Florida, that use its payment systems. Hannaford and Sweetbay are owned 
by Belgium's Delhaize Group.

The malware intercepted the "track 2" data stored on the magnetic stripe 
of payment cards as customers used them at the checkout counter, 
Dickinson wrote. This track includes the card's number and expiration 
date, but not the customer's name.

The data were taken "in transit for authorization from the point of 
sale," the letter states, meaning as it was transmitted from the cash 
register to one of the institutions that Hannaford uses to process 
transactions. Eleazer said these include major card networks and First 
Data Corp. of Denver, a major processor.

The malware on the store servers stored up records of these purchases in 
batches, then transmitted them to an unnamed offshore Internet service 
provider, the letter states. Foreign crime rings have been blamed in a 
number of other payment card fraud cases.

"Law enforcement officials and others report that the method of illicit 
acquisition is a new and sophisticated method in that it obtains data in 
transit during the course of the authorization process," the letter 
states.

Cluley said the software could have been installed remotely. This could 
have been accomplished through a breach of the company's firewall. 
Alternatively, the servers may not have been running the latest security 
patches, or may have had antivirus programs that weren't updated. 
Hannaford stated in the letter that it has replaced the hardware on 
which the malware was installed. Cluley said that could suggest a 
company insider or a technician for one of its vendors could have placed 
the code.

Executives of Visa Inc. of San Francisco, the largest payment card 
company, issued a statement yesterday saying it is working with 
Hannaford, banks, and law enforcement.

Hannaford said in its letter that it was certified a year ago as meeting 
card security standards and was recertified on Feb. 27. Eleazer said 
that was the day Visa first notified Hannaford of unusual card activity 
and began its investigation. That the standards did not stop the 
thieves, she said, "speaks to the increasing sophistication of the 
criminal element that propagates these attacks," she said.

Copyright 2008 Globe Newspaper Company.


___________________________________________________      
Subscribe to InfoSec News
http://www.infosecnews.org/mailman/listinfo/isn 

Site design & layout copyright © 1986-2014 CodeGods