AOH :: ISNQ6461.HTM

=?utf-8?q?Let=E2=80=99s_kill_the_kill-switch_debate_?=




=?utf-8?q?Let=E2=80=99s_kill_the_kill-switch_debate_?=
=?utf-8?q?Let=E2=80=99s_kill_the_kill-switch_debate_?=



http://gcn.com/articles/2010/07/05/cybereye-kill-the-kill-switch-debate.aspx 

By William Jackson
GCN.com
Jul 05, 2010

Let's all get a grip on ourselves and forget about the supposed "kill 
switch" in the cybersecurity legislation introduced last month by Sen. 
Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) and look at the reality instead.

There has been a lot of outrage expressed in recent weeks, much of it by 
unquestioning bloggers, about national emergency provisions that would 
empower the president to turn off the Internet -- whatever that means. 
 From what I can see, there is no such provision in the bill. And there 
doesn't need to be. The president of the United States, as commander in 
chief of the armed forces and the executive in charge in any emergency, 
already has broad powers that could be construed to allow control of 
vital resources without any help from Sen. Lieberman or his bill.

The present concerns have more to do with politics and business than 
with cybersecurity and the sanctity of the Internet.

Present cybersecurity strategies call for the National Security Agency 
to protect military and intelligence IT systems, puts the Homeland 
Security Department in charge of securing the .gov domain, and depends 
on the private sector to defend its resources. They are all supposed to 
cooperate, but just how is not spelled out, and what we have now is a 
fragmented and largely dysfunctional system.

[...]


_________________________________________________________________
Attend Black Hat USA 2010, hosted at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, Nevada
July 24-29th, offering over 60 training sessions and 11 tracks of Briefings
from security industry elite. To sign up visit http://www.blackhat.com 

Site design & layout copyright © 1986-2014 CodeGods