Even for economics-challenged congresscritters such as Ed Markey, this
is a bizarre record in terms of both public grandstanding and
interference with companies trying to sell products that consumers want
Apple makes the iPhone. It has every right to sell it via only AT&T if
it wishes (and without a cooperating carrier, the device would not be
nearly as useful because of things like visual voicemail). More broadly,
Apple has the right to sell it as it wishes, including making iPhones
only available for purchase on the third Monday of the month in
even-numbered zip codes if it chooses.
Here's one message I received from a non-Markey fan:
>As with the net neutrality debate, Rep. Markey seems to be
placing the cart before the horse (or the tin can before the string).
He/they want the so-called "innovation at the edges" first, decrying the
working market as being contrary to the interests of consumers. But the
market does work. And the iPhone is the latest example. Yet in
Markey's world, the iPhone may never have come to market (or arrive as
cheaply as it is considering its value) if the exclusivity of contract
couldn't have been created in the first place.
>Do you think for one moment that other players aren't busy,
concocting other ways in which to come in with better value below the
iPhone? Of course they are. I don't believe the consumer would be as
well served if Markey's view were to hold the day. The Cartefone
analogy, like his thinking, is outdated / wrongly monopoly-oriented.
Keep reading for the story.
Democrats criticize AT&T's exclusive iPhone deal
July 11, 2007 9:28 AM PDT
WASHINGTON--AT&T's exclusive right to sell the Apple iPhone drew
complaints on Wednesday from Democratic politicians, though it was
unclear whether they were planning to do anything about it.
"The problem with the iPhone is that the iPhone with AT&T is kind of
like a 'Hotel California' service," Massachusetts Rep. Ed Markey
said--in a nod to the Eagles hit, of course--during a hearing. "You can
check out any time you like, but you can never leave."
Even though the hearing before the House of Representatives subcommittee
on the Internet was supposed to be about "wireless innovation and
consumer protection," the iPhone popped up among Democrats as a subject
of criticism--and, among Republicans, as an example of the free market
and consumer choice in action...
"I think it's time that a consumer become the decider of what their
phones do, not their cell provider," said Rep. Mike Doyle, a
Politech mailing list
Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)