MIND GEAR VS. THETA
Original post
Posted to the Mind-L mailing list 6/27/95
MAIL FROM: THE MIND MACHINE PAGE
http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~andrewc/
MIND GEAR VS THETA
This posting is in reference to the many recent comments on the Mind Gear
line of machines. Mind Gear offers a nice product, especially in their
XCELR8R II. The programmability feature is useful and fun; helping you
design programs just right for your needs. However, Mind Gear is
seriously lacking in some vital areas. The number one weakness is the
sound quality of the machine. I've found the SLX sound so poor as the be
an annoyance. The SLX offers no binaural sound (as far as I'm aware), a
major reason for using L/S machines in the first place. The XCELR8R II
offers better "quality" and binaural sound but is still limited in
complexity and tone variance. The second weakness of the Mind Gear
machines is the inability to use Polysync tapes with sessions. You can
play music through the XCELR8R II but not in conjunction with L/S
programs; a very wonderful feature. Also, I've found the XCELR8R II
programs all very similar and find myself wishing for more variance after
extended use. The last weakness is the lack of good documentation.
Although I acknowledge Mind Gears excellent tech support, their manuals
for the machines leave much to be desired. The program descriptions are
limited and (as far as I'm aware) there a few to no learning tapes
designed in conjunction with the L/S programs. The Mind Gear is also a
very heavy machine due to its lead acid battery (if you choose this
option when purchasing).
The Voyager XL machine offers much that is missing in the XCELR8R II
(save for programmability). The missing programmability feature is
compensated for by excellently written and documented programs. Nearly
all sessions offer accompanying tapes or CDs and more programs can be
downloaded. Also, many of the programs were written by PhDs and
prominent persons in the psychotech world. The Polysync feature is a
very nice addition. However, the most noticeable feature of the Voyager
XL is its sound quality. The Voyager XL produces very pleasant chord
like sounds with great sound variance. The overall experience of the
Voyager XL is much smoother and pleasant than the XCELR8R II. However,
the Voyager offers fewer choices in light color than the XCELR8R II.
Also, the Voyager doesn't offer digital readout. The Voyager makes up
for this with its other strengths however. Finally, the Voyager XL is
smaller and much lighter than the XCELR8R II. You should try a few
machines before purchasing. If you can't try one, I'd suggest the
Voyager XL.
Happy mind journeys,
____ andrewc@ecst.csuchico.edu "A THOUSAND AND HUNDRED THOUSAND
/__ /_ _ _ ___ ___ _ _ FEATS OF INTELLECT SHALL NOT
// /// \/// \ / _/ /__ \\ // ACCOMPANY MAN IN THE HEREAFTER."
// ////\_//__//_/\ /___ \/\/ Sikism
TUCoPS is optimized to look best in Firefox® on a widescreen monitor (1440x900 or better).
Site design & layout copyright © 1986-2025 AOH